Perinatal Depression and Breastfeeding Outcomes: A Systematic Review from South Asian Countries
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Breastfeeding is very beneficial to both mothers and infants. However, perinatal depression, encompassing both antenatal and postnatal depression, can significantly impact breastfeeding. Prior research suggests a link between postpartum depression and breastfeeding difficulties. This systematic review focuses on the duration of breastfeeding, the duration of exclusive breastfeeding (EBF), initiation, as well as the early cessation of breastfeeding among mothers in South Asian countries with unique sociocultural practices and mental health experiences. Methodology: The searched databases were PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, ProQuest PsycINFO, EBSCOhost CINAHL, and Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (gray literature) for relevant records till February 2024. Studies conducted in South Asian countries with cross-sectional, cohort, or case–control designs were included, and all interventional studies, qualitative studies, case reports, and case series were excluded. The review examined breastfeeding duration among mothers with perinatal depression. Two reviewers independently screened and selected studies, extracted data, and used the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale for quality assessment. Results: This systematic review identified 109 records, of which 14 were eligible. Ten studies were cross-sectional and 4 were cohort studies. It involved 11,944 perinatal women, with sample sizes ranging from 100 to 8189 participants. Conclusion: Perinatal depression was associated with shorter breastfeeding duration, especially EBF and early cessation of all breastfeeding. However, any association between perinatal depression and the initiation of breastfeeding was unclear. Overall, supporting mothers suffering from perinatal depression is crucial for successful breastfeeding practice. Certain limitations of the review were data heterogeneity, risk of recall bias in breastfeeding practices, and different data collection time points. Future research could study the various sociocultural and economic factors and biological mechanisms in breastfeeding and maternal depression.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".