Retinal vascular alterations are associated with cognitive function and neuroimaging in white matter hyperintensities
Bibliographic record
Abstract
AIM: To reveal alterations in retinal structure, vessels, and function, and their association with cognitive function and neuroimaging in white matter hyperintensities (WMH). METHODS: This study enlisted WMH and age-matched healthy controls (HC). All participants underwent six different tests: magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain, the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), fundus photography, optical coherence tomography (OCT), and visual field testing. Visual field can reflect the function of optic nerve and retina. The peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (p-RNFL) was analyzed using OCT. Image J software was employed to measure retinal vascular caliber in fundus photographs and to compute the central retinal artery equivalent (CRAE), central retinal venous equivalent (CRVE) and arteriole-to-venule ratio (AVR). RESULTS: A total of 90 WMH patients and 93 HC participants. In comparison with the HC, the WMH group exhibited reduced cognitive function scores (MoCA: P < 0.001; MMSE: P < 0.001), narrower retinal arteries (P < 0.001), smaller AVR (P < 0.001) and thinner p-RNFL thickness (total: P = 0.026; temporal: P = 0.006). About visual field, both univariate and multivariate analysis showed that mean sensitivity decreased, and mean defect increased in WMH group (P < 0.05). Additionally, correlation analysis indicated a positive correlation between CRAE and AVR with MMSE and MoCA score (r = 0.424-0.57, P < 0.001) and a negative correlation with Fazekas score (CRAE: r = -0.515, P < 0.001; AVR: r = -0.554, P < 0.001), and p-RNFL was negatively correlated with Fazekas score (total p-RNFL: r = -0.192, P = 0.009; temporal p-RNFL: r = -0.217, P = 0.003). Notably, no significant correlation was found between cognitive function and p-RNFL. CONCLUSION: WMH group exhibit narrower retinal arteries, smaller arteriole-to-venule ratio, damaged p-RNFL and visual function. These alterations in retinal vessels are associate with both neuroimaging and cognitive function. Our results suggest that retinal imaging could serve as a valuable instrument for evaluating WMH and provides some new approaches to study the characteristic markers of WMH.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".