MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404545234 · doi:10.1016/j.jshs.2024.101012

The Youth Fitness International Test (YFIT) battery for monitoring and surveillance among children and adolescents: A modified Delphi consensus project with 169 experts from 50 countries and territories

2024· article· en· W4404545234 on OpenAlex
Francisco B. Ortega, Kai Zhang, Cristina Cadenas‐Sánchez, Mark S. Tremblay, Gregor Jurak, Grant R. Tomkinson, Jonatan R. Ruiz, Christine Delisle Nyström, Jennifer M. Sacheck, Russell R. Pate, Kathryn L. Weston, Tetsuhiro Kidokoro, Eric Tsz‐Chun Poon, Lucy-Joy Wachira, Ronald Ssenyonga, Thayse Natacha Gomes, Carlos Cristi‐Montero, Brooklyn J. Fraser, Claudia Niessner, Vincent Onywera, Yang Liu, Li-Lin Liang, Stéphanie A. Prince, David R. Lubans, Justin J. Lang

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of sport and health science/Journal of Sport and Health Science · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDelphi Technique in Research
Canadian institutionsPublic Health Agency of CanadaChildren's Hospital of Eastern Ontario
FundersAgencia Estatal de InvestigaciónUniversidad de CuencaUniversidade Federal de SergipeNelson Mandela UniversityShanghai Institute of TechnologyPeking UniversityUniversity of Northern British ColumbiaUniverza v LjubljaniUniversidad de GranadaUniversidad de Castilla-La ManchaHáskóli ÍslandsPublic Health Agency of CanadaUniversität ZürichAlbert-Ludwigs-Universität FreiburgEast China Normal UniversityShanghai University of SportUniversity of South AustraliaHong Kong Baptist UniversityPublic Health AgencyEdge Hill UniversityVictoria UniversityErasmus+Junta de AndalucíaEuropean CommissionUniversity of AlbertaUniversità degli Studi di PaviaItä-Suomen YliopistoNational University of Singapore
KeywordsTest (biology)Delphi methodPsychologyVariety (cybernetics)Environmental healthGerontologyApplied psychologyMedicineComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Physical fitness in childhood and adolescence is associated with a variety of health outcomes and is a powerful marker of current and future health. However, inconsistencies in tests and protocols limit international monitoring and surveillance. The objective of the study was to seek international consensus on a proposed, evidence-informed, Youth Fitness International Test (YFIT) battery and protocols for health monitoring and surveillance in children and adolescents aged 6-18 years. METHODS: We conducted an international modified Delphi study to evaluate the level of agreement with a proposed, evidence-based, YFIT of core health-related fitness tests and protocols to be used worldwide in 6- to 18-year-olds. This proposal was based on previous European and North American projects that systematically reviewed the existing evidence to identify the most valid, reliable, health-related, safe, and feasible fitness tests to be used in children and adolescents aged 6-18 years. We designed a single-panel modified Delphi study and invited 216 experts from all around the world to answer this Delphi survey, of whom one-third are from low-to-middle income countries and one-third are women. Four experts were involved in the piloting of the survey and did not participate in the main Delphi study to avoid bias. We pre-defined an agreement of ≥80% among the expert participants to achieve consensus. RESULTS: We obtained a high response rate (78%) with a total of 169 fitness experts from 50 countries and territories, including 63 women and 61 experts from low- or middle-income countries/territories. Consensus (>85% agreement) was achieved for all proposed tests and protocols, supporting the YFIT battery, which includes weight and height (to compute body mass index as a proxy of body size/composition), the 20-m shuttle run (cardiorespiratory fitness), handgrip strength, and standing long jump (muscular fitness). CONCLUSION: This study contributes to standardizing fitness tests and protocols used for research, monitoring, and surveillance across the world, which will allow for future data pooling and the development of international and regional sex- and age-specific reference values, health-related cut-points, and a global picture of fitness among children and adolescents.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.013
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0130.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.006
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.091
GPT teacher head0.429
Teacher spread0.338 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it