MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404553647 · doi:10.1016/j.plrev.2024.11.012

Connecting brain and mind through temporo-spatial dynamics: Towards a theory of common currency

2024· review· en· W4404553647 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysics of Life Reviews · 2024
Typereview
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeural dynamics and brain function
Canadian institutionsUniversity of OttawaRoyal Ottawa Mental Health Centre
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaSocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council of CanadaPhysicians' Services Incorporated FoundationHorizon 2020 Framework ProgrammeHORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme
KeywordsDynamics (music)Computer scienceCurrencyCognitive psychologyArtificial intelligenceCognitive scienceNeurosciencePsychologyLinguistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

• We advance a common currency Theory, which proposes temporo-spatial dynamics as a shared framework for neural and mental features. • Novel empirical evidence extends the theory to include spatial features such as topographic organization. • Temporal and spatial correspondences between neural and mental states span a continuum from simple to complex. • Evidence indicates a significant explanatory power for diverse phenomena of interest to neuroscience, including meditation, depression, and thought dynamics. • This work marks a transition from the hypothesis to a comprehensive common currency theory of neuro-mental relationships. Despite major progress in our understanding of the brain, the connection of neural and mental features, that is, brain and mind, remains yet elusive. In our 2020 target paper (“Is temporospatial dynamics the ‘common currency’ of brain and mind? Spatiotemporal Neuroscience”) we proposed the “Common currency hypothesis”: temporo-spatial dynamics are shared by neural and mental features, providing their connection. The current paper aims to further support and extend the original description of such common currency into a first outline of a “Common currency theory” (CCT) of neuro-mental relationship. First, we extend the range of examples to thoughts, meditation, depression and attention all lending support that temporal characteristics, (i.e. dynamics) are shared by both neural and mental features. Second, we now also show empirical examples of how spatial characteristics, i.e., topography, are shared by neural and mental features; this is illustrated by topographic reorganization of both neural and mental states in depression and meditation. Third, considering the neuro-mental connection in theoretical terms, we specify their relationship by distinct forms of temporospatial correspondences, ranging on a continuum from simple to complex. In conclusion, we extend our initial hypothesis about the key role of temporo-spatial dynamics in neuro-mental relationship into a first outline of an integrated mind-brain theory, the “Common currency theory” (CCT).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.945
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.156
GPT teacher head0.386
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it