MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404554143 · doi:10.33137/utjph.v5i1.44207

Perspectives of perinatal participants who have discontinued brief behavioural activation treatment: Insights from the SUMMIT Trial

2024· article· en· W4404554143 on OpenAlexaff
Savannah Torres-Salbach, Nicole Andrejek, Nour Schoueri‐Mychasiw, Daisy R. Singla

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of Toronto Journal of Public Health · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMaternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
Canadian institutionsSinai Health SystemLunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research InstituteCentre for Addiction and Mental HealthPublic Health OntarioUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAnxietyDiscontinuationRandomized controlled trialMental healthSummitFeelingPopulationPsychiatryDepression (economics)PsychologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective: Up to 20% of women experience symptoms of depression and anxiety during the perinatal period (1). However, as few as 12% receive effective mental health treatment due to various barriers to care (2). In this study, we examined the reasons why perinatal women with symptoms of depression and anxiety who participated in a psychotherapy clinical trial chose to discontinue treatment. The objective was to understand some of the personal and structural barriers this population experiences when accessing mental healthcare. Methods: We conducted a qualitative sub-study within the Scaling Up Maternal Mental healthcare by Increasing access to Treatment (SUMMIT) trial. SUMMIT is a four-arm, randomized, non-inferiority trial to test the effectiveness of behavioural activation aimed at alleviating symptoms of depression and anxiety among perinatal women. Participants were randomized by delivery mode (telemedicine vs. in-person) and provider (specialist vs. non-specialist). Of 1,183 SUMMIT participants, 225 (19%) chose to discontinue treatment, of which N=18 were contacted and agreed to be part of the current study. We conducted a content analysis to identify the most commonly reported reasons for treatment discontinuation. Results: Among 18 participants, the most highly endorsed reasons for treatment discontinuation included: transportation challenges (n=13, 72.2%), difficulty arranging childcare (n=11, 61.1%), dissatisfaction with their assigned delivery mode (n=11, 61.1%), work-family conflict (n=6, 33.3%), feeling overwhelmed (n=6, 33.3%), and health concerns or risks associated with hospital-based counselling (n=6, 33.3%). Participants also expressed dissatisfaction with the content or structure of behavioural activation (n=5, 27.8%) and the timing of treatment (received in pregnancy vs. postpartum) (n=4, 22.2%) which contributed to their discontinuation. Conclusion: Our findings provide insights into the personal and structural barriers perinatal individuals experience when accessing treatment in the context of a research setting. Perinatal participants expressed a preference for virtual mental healthcare for its convenience, demonstrating a feasible way to reduce some of the barriers to care.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.047
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.092
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.047
Threshold uncertainty score0.250

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0470.092
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.002
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0020.004
Research integrity0.0030.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.071
GPT teacher head0.320
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity of Toronto Journal of Public HealthSame topicMaternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumFrench-language works237,207