MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404559853 · doi:10.1200/op-24-00840

Systemic Therapy for Small Cell Lung Cancer: ASCO Guideline Rapid Recommendation Update Clinical Insights

2024· article· en· W4404559853 on OpenAlexaff
Humera Khurshid, Nofisat Ismaila, Millie Das, Swati Kulkarni, Rami Manochakian, Frank Weinberg, Gregory P. Kalemkerian

Bibliographic record

VenueJCO Oncology Practice · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLung Cancer Research Studies
Canadian institutionsWindsor Regional HospitalWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGuidelineLung cancerMedicineSystemic therapyIntensive care medicineOncologyMedical physicsClinical OncologyInternal medicineCancerPathologyBreast cancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In 2023, an evidence-based guideline on the systemic therapy for small cell lung cancer (SCLC) was published by ASCO and Ontario Health (Cancer Care Ontario).1 Recently, an amendment to the guideline was published (Figs 1 and 2), 2 on the basis of the results of the phase III ADRIATIC trial evaluating the efficacy of consolidation immunotherapy after chemoradiotherapy in patients with limited-stage (LS) SCLC 3 and the phase II DeLLphi-301 trial evaluating tarlatamab in relapsed SCLC. 4 This companion article addresses several questions that clinicians may encounter when following the updated guideline recommendations. WHICH PATIENTS WITH LS-SCLC SHOULD BE CONSIDERED FOR CONSOLIDATION THERAPY WITH DURVALUMAB?On the basis of the published data from the ADRIATIC trial, 3 durvalumab consolidation for up to 2 years is recommended for patients with LS-SCLC who have not had progression of disease after completion of curative-intent chemoradiotherapy.Eligibility criteria included: completion of three to four cycles of chemotherapy with cisplatin or carboplatin plus etoposide along with concurrent definitive thoracic radiotherapy; achievement of treatment response or stable disease; WHO performance status (PS) 0-1 after chemoradiotherapy; no active or prior autoimmune disease; no history of pneumonitis of grade ≥2; and resolution of toxicity from prior chemoradiotherapy to grade ≤1.Prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) was allowed after completion of chemoradiotherapy and before the start of consolidation therapy.To assess the appropriateness of consolidation durvalumab for an individual patient, it is necessary to understand both the benefits and risks of treatment.Patients were randomly assigned after completion of chemoradiotherapy to receive either durvalumab 1,500 mg once every 4 weeks (n 5 264) or placebo (n 5 266) for up to 2 years, with treatment starting within 42 days of the completion of chemoradiotherapy.With a median follow-up of 37.2 months, the median overall survival (OS) was 55.9 months for durvalumab and 33.4 months for placebo (hazard ratio [HR], 0.73 [98.3% CI, 0.54 to 0.98]; P 5 .01).The OS rates at 36 months were 56.5% versus 47.6% for durvalumab versus placebo, respectively.The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 16.6 months for durvalumab and 9.2 months for placebo (HR, 0.76 [97.2% CI, 0.59 to 0.98]; P 5 .02).The PFS rates at 24 months were 46.2% versus 34.2% for durvalumab versus placebo, respectively.Overall, these data suggest that about 10% of patients will have a long-term survival benefit with durvalumab.All-cause grade 3-4 adverse events (AEs) occurred in 24.4% of patients receiving durvalumab and 24.2% receiving placebo.Treatment-related grade 3-4 AEs were reported in 8.8% of patients receiving durvalumab and 6% of patients receiving placebo.Patients receiving durvalumab had higher rates of AEs leading to drug discontinuation (16.4% v 10.6%) and death (2.7% v 1.9%).Immune-related AEs were reported in 32.1% of patients receiving durvalumab and 10.2% receiving placebo.Pneumonitis (of any cause) of any grade (38.2% v 30.2%) and grade 3-4 (3.1% v 2.6%) also occurred more frequently with durvalumab.Most patients with LS-SCLC treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy have dramatic improvement in their tumor burden and cancer-associated symptoms.Although side effects of treatment, such as fatigue, myelosuppression, and esophagitis, are common, they usually improve within 6 weeks of completion of chemoradiotherapy.Therefore, most patients with LS-SCLC will be candidates for consolidation durvalumab.Although ADRIATIC was limited to

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.014
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.061
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.072

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0140.061
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.004
Bibliometrics0.0040.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0030.003
Research integrity0.0070.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.099
GPT teacher head0.522
Teacher spread0.423 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueJCO Oncology PracticeSame topicLung Cancer Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207