MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404563379 · doi:10.1109/tce.2024.3503492

Electric Field Energy Harvesting From High-Voltage Power Lines for Consumer Batteryless Wireless Sensor Networks

2024· article· en· W4404563379 on OpenAlexafffund
Thomas Micallef, Xiaoqiang Gu, Ke Wu

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEnergy Harvesting in Wireless Networks
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
FundersFonds de recherche du Québec
KeywordsEnergy harvestingElectrical engineeringWireless sensor networkVoltageWirelessHigh voltagePower (physics)Energy (signal processing)EngineeringElectronic engineeringTelecommunicationsComputer sciencePhysicsComputer network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Leakage electromagnetic energy widely exists in the vicinity of high-voltage power lines. This work proposes a comprehensive electric field energy harvester, which can drive a commercial consumer-oriented Zigbee-based Wireless Sensor Platform (WSP). Electric field energy harvesting is selected as its energy density is about 60 uJ/m3 under 525-kV power lines, twice higher than that due to the magnetic field. To this end, a capacitive coupling model is studied to evaluate electric energy harvesters placed under high-voltage power lines, which is proven with good accuracy. A complete energy harvesting platform is developed, which contains a two plates-based energy harvester, a bridge rectifier, a storage capacitor, and an ultra-low-power comparator. Experimental verification shows that the proposed batteryless wireless sensing platform can operate every 40 s corresponding to 3.3 mJ of energy collected in this period under the 525-kV power lines. This electric energy harvesting approach is believed to have great potential for energizing wireless sensor networks under high-voltage power lines.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.900
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Consumer ElectronicsSame topicEnergy Harvesting in Wireless NetworksFrench-language works237,207