MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A Sensorless Feedforward Balancing Compensator for Improved Interphase Dynamics in Auxiliary-Assisted Dual-Inductor-Hybrid Converters

2024· article· en· W4404563982 on OpenAlexaff
Orest Cobani, Nameer Khan, John Pigott, Henk Jan Bergveld, Olivier Trescases

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrogrid Control and Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNXP Semiconductors
KeywordsFeed forwardConvertersInductorControl theory (sociology)Dual (grammatical number)Computer scienceInterphaseElectronic engineeringControl engineeringEngineeringVoltageControl (management)Electrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hybrid Switched-Capacitor (SC) converters are well-suited for space-critical 48V automotive applications due to their high power density, however, the fast transient response necessary for the stringent regulation requirements of CPU core voltages remains a challenge. A Dual-Inductor Hybrid (DIH) dc-dc converter with a flying-capacitor-tapped auxiliary stage was proposed to improve the load transient response, however, the converter output and DIH interphase dynamics become coupled. This paper presents a sensorless feedforward compensation scheme for improving the interphase dynamics in the 48V-to-1V auxiliary-assisted DIH converter. The proposed scheme extracts the auxiliary duty cycle and adjusts the duration of the DIH switching states to reduce the balancing time of the interphase dynamics. A small-signal model of the auxiliary-assisted DIH converter is proposed and validated with simulation results to analyze the closed-loop stability of the proposed technique. Experimental results demonstrate that the feedforward compensation scheme reduces the settling time of the interphase dynamics by 65% while eliminating the use of an external sensor for active balancing in the auxiliary-assisted DIH converter.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.895
Threshold uncertainty score0.840

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMicrogrid Control and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207