MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404571497 · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhae444

Monitoring of nonspatial information within working memory in the common marmoset (<i>Callithrix jacchus</i>)

2024· article· en· W4404571497 on OpenAlexafffund
Veronika Zlatkina, Stephen Frey, Michael Petrides

Bibliographic record

VenueCerebral Cortex · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicMemory and Neural Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityRogue Research (Canada)Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital
FundersCanada First Research Excellence FundNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMitacsMcGill University
KeywordsMarmosetCallithrixWorking memoryMacaquePrimateCognitionNeuroscienceDorsolateral prefrontal cortexPsychologyDorsolateralCognitive psychologyPrefrontal cortexBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The mid-dorsolateral prefrontal cortical region (areas 46 and 9/46) is critical for the monitoring of information in working memory both in the macaque monkey brain and the human brain. The presence of this cytoarchitectonic region in the New World marmoset brain was in debate, but recent anatomical evidence demonstrated a limited area 46. This finding raised the question of the extent to which the marmoset brain can support the cognitive control process of monitoring information within working memory. This cognitive control process was assessed in adult marmosets and was shown to be limited to the monitoring of only two items in contrast to macaque monkeys, who can monitor as many as five items in working memory. The results are consistent with the limited development of the relevant prefrontal region in the marmoset and contribute to understanding the evolution of higher cognitive control processes in the primate brain.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.141
Threshold uncertainty score0.423

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.065
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCerebral CortexSame topicMemory and Neural MechanismsFrench-language works237,207