MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404582969 · doi:10.2478/enr-2024-0026

Various apolipoprotein E genotypes relate to responsiveness to flaxseed lignan complex in older persons with type 2 diabetes mellitus

2024· article· en· W4404582969 on OpenAlexafffund
Douglas E. Barre, Kazimiera A. Mizier-Barre, Odette Griscti

Bibliographic record

VenueEndocrine Regulations · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPhytoestrogen effects and research
Canadian institutionsCape Breton University
FundersNova Scotia Health Research FoundationCape Breton University
KeywordsType 2 Diabetes MellitusInternal medicineGenotypeDyslipidemiaMedicineBlood pressureDiabetes mellitusLipoproteinEndocrinologyPlaceboApolipoprotein EType 2 diabetesLipid profileObesityCholesterolBiologyGeneticsPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Objective. The objective of the study was to determine if there would be statistically significant differences or trends among apolipoprotein E genotypes in the responsiveness of members of a cluster of seven measures in older persons with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) consuming flaxseed lignan complex (FLC). The cluster of seven are abdominal obesity, hypertension, platelet hyperaggregability, hyperglycemia, dyslipidemia (decreased plasma levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDLc), and increased plasma levels of triglycerides), increased low-density lipoprotein (LDL) oxidation and increased inflammation. All cluster members exacerbate T2DM. Methods. Sixteen patients with well-controlled T2DM participated in this double-blind randomized, placebo-controlled crossover study consisting of four visits. Apolipoprotein E genotyping was done at visit one. The cluster of seven, diet, exercise, smoking and medication use were assessed at each visit. Results. The 3/4 genotype showed a stronger downward trend in systolic blood pressure compared to the 3/3 genotype with no trend or significant difference in the 2/4 genotype. There was a downward trend in diastolic blood pressure in genotype 3/3 compared genotype 2/4, which showed no significant difference or trend. Only genotype 3/4 showed a significant drop in diastolic pressure compared to genotypes 2/4 and 3/3. HDLc only showed a downward trend in 3/4 relative to genotypes 2/4 and 3/3. LDL apolipoprotein B oxidation (LDL-Box) only showed an upward trend in 3/3 compared to genotypes 2/4 and 3/4. There were no other significant differences or trends by genotype in the cluster of seven. Conclusions. It appears that those with the 2/4 genotype may not benefit from FLC, those with 3/3 and 3/4 genotypes may benefit only in terms of systolic and diastolic pressures, those with the apo E 3/4 genotype should perhaps avoid FLC to manage HDLc, and those with the 3/3 genotype should perhaps avoid FLC to manage LDL apolipoprotein B oxidation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.842
Threshold uncertainty score0.572

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEndocrine RegulationsSame topicPhytoestrogen effects and researchFrench-language works237,207