MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404593739 · doi:10.15288/jsad.24-00353

Do We Need Additional Indicators for the Sustainable Development Goal Target 3.5 on Strengthening the Prevention and Treatment of Substance Abuse? An Analysis of Recent Submissions to the UN Inter-Agency and Expert Group

2024· article· en· W4404593739 on OpenAlexaff
Jürgen Rehm, Kevin D. Shield

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicGlobal Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
Canadian institutionsCanada Research ChairsPublic Health OntarioUniversity of TorontoWestern UniversityCentre for Addiction and Mental Health
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAgency (philosophy)Sustainable developmentPoison controlSubstance abuseSuicide preventionOccupational safety and healthInjury preventionRisk analysis (engineering)BusinessEnvironmental healthMedicinePolitical sciencePsychiatrySociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.055
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.120
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.945
Threshold uncertainty score0.291

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0550.120
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0130.022
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0080.011
Open science0.0040.004
Research integrity0.0040.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.345
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designObservational
DomainMethods
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Studies on Alcohol and DrugsSame topicGlobal Public Health Policies and EpidemiologyFrench-language works237,207