Sustainable development: Genesis, challenges and perspectives
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The notion of sustainable development appeared in a period when humanity, prey to the conse-quences of the anarchic destruction of the environment, decided to change the paradigm of eco-nomic development called bad (bad) development to turn towards good development or ecode-velopment. If in the countries of the North, the concept is in phase with an adaptation or even an adequacy with the system of governance, this is not the case in the countries of the South. There is a need to rediscover this concept and do a fairly complete rereading of the proposed actions. The objective of this review is to present the facts, challenges and perspectives on sustainable development. Methodology: A systematic search was carried out in the Scopus and Google Scholar database using the key concepts: Sustainable Development, development indicators, ur-ban revitalization, eco-district, SOUTH countries. 69 selected articles relate to theoretical studies, field studies, study reports, international conferences and summits and expert declarations. Sus-tainable development takes into account the economic, social, cultural and especially environ-mental aspects which rhyme with a new governance policy where the actors are made up of rep-resentatives of grassroots communities: this is governance from below. The consequence is ur-ban governance which takes into account the priority issues of poor populations gathered in pe-ripheral districts which must be transformed into eco-districts. The approach to sustainable de-velopment is to evolve the principles and frameworks of city and regional planning by integrat-ing new economic, social and environmental issues. This gradually involves numerous modifi-cations by moving from a compartmentalized system of city governance to an integrated city management system or better to inclusive governance. Halfway to its completion, in view of the urban challenges, especially environmental ones, there is an urgent need for a reassessment of the strategies deployed to achieve the objectives of sustainable development globally and specif-ically in the global south.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".