MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4404596609 · doi:10.1101/2024.11.20.624545

Major changes in gene expression between strains of diapausing and non-diapause spruce budworm despite little evidence of genetic divergence

2024· preprint· en· W4404596609 on OpenAlexaff
Karin R. L. van der Burg, Jeff Gauthier, Amanda D. Roe, Michel Cusson, Brian Boyle, Roger C. Lévesque, Katie E. Marshall

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2024
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFire effects on ecosystems
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources CanadaUniversité LavalCanadian Forest ServiceUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDiapauseSpruce budwormBiologyDivergence (linguistics)GeneGenetic divergenceGeneticsEvolutionary biologyBotanyLepidoptera genitaliaGenetic diversityDemographyLarva

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract To survive harsh winter conditions, many insects enter a state of dormancy called diapause which allows them to withstand extreme temperatures and lack of food. When diapause is induced, insects enter a state of arrested development and low metabolic rate. Because diapause and environmental conditions are closely linked, variation within and between species in diapause induction, depth, and duration is extremely common. Studies investigating the genetic underpinnings of diapause tend to focus on either different populations and/or environmental variation, which runs the risk of confounding the genetic signal either due to isolation-by-distance or variation in environmental conditions. We use the eastern spruce budworm ( Choristoneura fumiferana ) to circumvent these issues and investigate within-population variation in diapause. C. fumiferana usually diapauses as second instar larvae, but a small subset of individuals does not diapause and instead continues through development. This non-diapause phenotype can be selected to create a non-diapause strain. Here, we present a chromosome-level assembly of such a non-diapause strain, and compare it to an earlier published genome assembly of the diapause strain. We did not find evidence of major chromosome rearrangements, indicating that the genetic variation between strains is likely small and multi-genic. Gene expression comparisons between the strains indicate major gene expression changes, where genes associated with glycolysis and environmental signaling processing increase in expression in the diapause strain. Lastly, we found that gene expression diverges halfway through the first instar, and not before, indicating that the signal to induce diapause happens early in the first instar. Significance statement The ability to enter diapause is a crucial adaptation for many insects to survive cold winters. The genetic underpinnings of the diapause phenotype has been the target of many investigations. However, many of these studies focus on variation in diapause on between geographic regions or changes in environmental conditions, which can lead to confounding factors. Here, we focus on within-population variation in diapause in the eastern spruce budworm, with two strains established from the same source population that vary in their ability to induce diapause. We present a chromosome level assembly of the non-diapause strain, and report that genetic changes between the diapause and the non-diapause line are likely small and involve multiple loci. Gene expression differences were extensive, and mostly associated with mechanisms to avoid freezing. This work sets the stage to further investigate how minimal genetic changes can lead to large-scale phenotypic changes as impactful as diapause.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)→Same topicFire effects on ecosystems→French-language works237,207→