MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404599481 · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad8448

The Extremely Metal-poor SN 2023ufx: A Local Analog to High-redshift Type II Supernovae

2024· article· en· W4404599481 on OpenAlexfundno aff
M. A. Tucker, Jason T. Hinkle, C. R. Angus, Katie Auchettl, W. B. Hoogendam, B. J. Shappee, C. S. Kochanek, C. Ashall, Thomas de Boer, K. C. Chambers, D. Desai, A. Do, M. Fulton, Hua Gao, Joanna Herman, M. E. Huber, C. Lidman, Chien-Cheng Lin, T. Lowe, E. A. Magnier, Brian Martin, P. Mínguez, M. Nicholl, M. Pursiainen, S. J. Smartt, K. Smith, Shubham Srivastav, B. Tucker, R. J. Wainscoat

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Astrophysical Journal · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicGamma-ray bursts and supernovae
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersPlanetary Science DivisionDivision of Astronomical SciencesScience Mission DirectorateLeibniz-Institut für Astrophysik PotsdamEötvös Loránd TudományegyetemStockholms UniversitetScience and Technology Facilities CouncilAarhus UniversitetTurun YliopistoUniversitetet i OsloNational Science FoundationUniversity of MinnesotaUK Research and InnovationAustralian Research CouncilSpace Telescope Science InstituteNuclear Safety and Security CommissionHáskóli ÍslandsDurham UniversityIstituto Nazionale di AstrofisicaSmithsonian Astrophysical ObservatoryArizona Board of RegentsEuropean Research CouncilGordon and Betty Moore FoundationQueen's University BelfastOhio State UniversityUK Space AgencyLeibniz-GemeinschaftUniversity of Notre DameQueen's UniversityLos Alamos National LaboratoryJohns Hopkins UniversityMax-Planck-Institut für AstronomieOhio Board of RegentsNational Central UniversityNational Aeronautics and Space AdministrationSmithsonian Institution
KeywordsPhysicsSupernovaAstrophysicsRedshiftAstronomyType (biology)MetalGalaxy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We present extensive observations of the Type II supernova (SN II) SN 2023ufx, which is likely the most metal-poor SN II observed to date. It exploded in the outskirts of a low-metallicity (Z host ∼ 0.1 Z ⊙) dwarf (M g = −13.39 ± 0.16 mag, r proj ∼ 1 kpc) galaxy. The explosion is luminous, peaking at M g ≈ −18.5 mag, and shows rapid evolution. The r-band (pseudobolometric) light curve has a shock-cooling phase lasting 20 (17) days followed by a 19 (23) day plateau. The entire optically thick phase lasts only ≈55 days following explosion, indicating that the red supergiant progenitor had a thinned H envelope prior to explosion. The early spectra obtained during the shock-cooling phase show no evidence for narrow emission features and limit the preexplosion mass-loss rate to M ̇ ≲ 10 − 3 M ⊙ yr−1. The photospheric-phase spectra are devoid of prominent metal absorption features, indicating a progenitor metallicity of ≲0.1 Z ⊙. The seminebular (∼60–130 days) spectra reveal weak Fe ii, but other metal species typically observed at these phases (Ti ii, Sc ii, and Ba ii) are conspicuously absent. The late-phase optical and near-infrared spectra also reveal broad (≈104 km s−1) double-peaked Hα, Pβ, and Pγ emission profiles suggestive of a fast outflow launched during the explosion. Outflows are typically attributed to rapidly rotating progenitors, which also prefer metal-poor environments. This is only the second SN II with ≲0.1 Z ⊙ and both exhibit peculiar evolution, suggesting a sizable fraction of metal-poor SNe II have distinct properties compared to nearby metal-enriched SNe II. These observations lay the groundwork for modeling the metal-poor SNe II expected in the early Universe.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Astrophysical JournalSame topicGamma-ray bursts and supernovaeFrench-language works237,207