Refuge and supplementary bamboo-based diet in capuchin monkeys ( <i>Sapajus nigritus cucullatus</i> ) in association with habitat fragmentation and stochastic events
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Capuchin monkeys (Sapajus nigritus cucullatus) are the most omnivorous primates of the New World. However, forest fragmentation and degradation may limit resources availability. This in turn can act synergistically with other factors, such as severe weather conditions and potentially causing changes in spatial distribution, behavior, and diet. During field observations of capuchin monkeys we recorded the use of bamboo forest patches as refuge sites and as supplementary food sources. This behavior was observed in December 2021 in fragmented environments and low availability of resources, after an extreme drought event recorded in Northeastern Argentina. Bamboo forest patches of Chusquea ramosissima, Guadua chacoensis, G. trinii, and Merostachys clausenii were used as refuge sites, and as supplementary sources of food and water (i.e. foliage leaves, shoots, and caryopsis) under conditions of scarce resource availability and extreme drought events.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".