Physical activity and constipation: A systematic review of cohort studies
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Constipation significantly impacts quality of life and is a common public health issue. For affected individuals, especially those who are inactive and experience constipation symptoms, it is recommended to engage in physical activity (PA) to improve their condition. However, the relationship between PA and improvement in constipation remains unclear. We performed this systematic review of cohort studies to evaluate this potential association. Methods: We systematically searched the Embase, Cochrane Library, PubMed, and CINAHL databases for all cohort studies examining the relationship between PA and constipation from the inception of the databases up to 5 November 2023. We calculated the reported risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), conducted a random effects model, and performed a subgroup analysis based on factors such as gender, geographic region, and PA intensity to comprehensively explore the link between PA and constipation. Furthermore, we used the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale to evaluate the quality of the studies included in our analysis. Results: The analysis included 13 studies with 119 426 participants and 63 713 cases. The results indicated that higher levels of PA were associated with a decreased risk of constipation compared with lower levels of PA (RR = 0.69; 95% CI = 0.88-0.83) and moderate levels of PA (RR = 0.87; 95% CI = 0.79-0.95). Furthermore, adherence to international PA guidelines was correlated with a significantly reduced risk of constipation (RR = 0.87; 95% CI = 0.81-0.93). Notably, the risk of constipation was lowered among Asian populations (RR = 0.67; 95% CI = 0.56-0.79) and Oceanian populations (RR = 0.72; 95% CI = 0.63-0.83) who engaged in regular PA. Moreover, when comparing the risk of constipation between men and women collectively, PA was associated with a 34% lower risk (RR = 0.66; 95% CI = 0.55-0.80). Conclusions: The study findings indicated that moderate to high levels of PA significantly reduced the risk of constipation, showing a negative correlation between PA and constipation. Registration: PROSPERO: CRD42023479653.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".