High variability of migration strategies in a reestablished <i>Cygnus buccinator</i> (Trumpeter Swan) population
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT The interior population (IP) of Cygnus buccinator (Trumpeter Swan), formerly extirpated by market hunting, was reestablished in eastern North America by releasing individuals from both migratory and nonmigratory populations. Their current annual movement patterns are largely unknown. We deployed 113 Global Positioning System–Global System for Mobile Communications transmitters on IP C. buccinator in 6 U.S. states and 1 Canadian province across the current IP breeding range. Using data from 252 “swan-years,” we estimated migration phenology using piecewise regression models fit to each yearly time series of displacement from the breeding site. We fit a latent-state model to characterize population-level associations between breeding latitude and maximum extent of migration, and linear mixed models to quantify associations between individual characteristics (e.g., breeding status and sex) and migration phenology. At the individual level, 59% of swans moved to distant nonbreeding period areas (long-distance migration, defined as moving &gt;100 km from the breeding site), 16% exhibited regional migration (25–100 km from breeding site), 19% exhibited nonmigratory but local movements (&lt;25 km from breeding site), and 6% exhibited multiple migration strategies. Swans breeding at more-northern latitudes departed their territories earlier in autumn, returned later in the spring, and migrated farther from their breeding territories than those breeding at more southern latitudes. Although the population-level association between migration extent and breeding latitude was positive, some individuals remained close to the location of their breeding site during the nonbreeding period. Breeding swans departed later in the autumn than nonbreeders, but breeding status did not have a strong association with arrival in the spring. IP C. buccinator are partial migrants, with a continuum of strategies that vary latitudinally, from local movements to long-distance migration. Much of the variability in movement patterns is related to factors tied to natural history demands (e.g., breeding status) and response to environmental conditions (e.g., through associations with breeding latitude).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".