Instilling The Value of Religious Moderation in Preventing Radicalism at The Ma'had Madinatul Ma Madinatul Khairaat Buntuna Islamic Boarding School
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Religious radicalism is one of the threats to the harmony of society and the state. Islamic boarding schools as Islamic educational institutions have an important role in preventing the spread of radical ideology through moderate education. This study was conducted to understand how the process of instilling the values of religious moderation takes place in this Islamic boarding school and its effectiveness in preventing radicalism among students. This study uses a qualitative research method with a case study approach. The data collection technique in this study is through literature studies and document studies. The data that has been collected is then analyzed in three stages, namely data reduction, data presentation and drawing conclusions. The results of the study show that Pesantren Ma'had Madinatul Khairaat Buntuna emphasizes the importance of moderate education with an approach that teaches students to respect differences, both among fellow Muslims and with adherents of other religions. Values such as tolerance, deliberation, and brotherhood are instilled through various religious activities, such as religious studies, discussions, and social activities outside the pesantren. Students are also taught to understand religious teachings as a whole, not only from a narrow literal perspective, so that they are able to ward off radicalism.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".