Influence of planar defects on the mechanical behaviors of spherical metallic nanoparticles
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract In present study, we adopt molecular dynamics simulations to investigate the influences of typical planar defects, including twin boundaries (TBs), stacking faults (SFs) and grain boundaries (GBs), on the mechanical properties of fcc copper nanoparticles. Groups of nanoparticle samples, including defect-free single crystal and those with specific defects, are examined for elastic modulus, yield strength, and deformation mechanisms. Detailed results reveal that the elastic behavior of nanoparticles can be well described by a modified theoretical model regardless the type of defects. While the planar defects have negligible influence on the elastic modulus, they significantly enhance the yield strength of nanoparticles. Notably, nanoparticles containing fivefold TBs exhibit the highest yield stress, i.e. ∼17.0 GPa, even surpassing that of the defect-free counterparts, i.e. ∼10.0 GP. Analysis of atomic deformation unravels that the distinct yielding behaviors are attributed to the activation of different slip systems and the nucleation of dislocations at specific preferential sites. These findings highlight the potential of fabricating planar defects to tailor the mechanical properties of metallic nanoparticles for targeted applications in nanotechnology and materials science.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it