MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404630482 · doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.112880

Disentangling the effects of multiple stressors on freshwater macroinvertebrates: A quantitative analysis of experimental studies

2024· article· en· W4404630482 on OpenAlexaff
Simin Bao, Jani Heino, Hao Xiong, Jun Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueEcological Indicators · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEnvironmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology
Canadian institutionsMinistry of Agriculture
FundersFundamental Research Funds for the Central UniversitiesNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsStressorEcologyInvertebrateQuantitative analysis (chemistry)Environmental scienceBiologyChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

• Additive effects of multiple stressors were common in their impact on freshwater macroinvertebrates. • Fine sediment increases and EPT taxa were often associated with interactive effects. • Antagonistic and reversal effects were common between fine sediment increase and flow decrease or nutrient increase. • Synergistic interactions between fine sediment and temperature often impacted EPT richness. Multiple stressors in freshwater ecosystems usually interact and produce synergistic, antagonistic, reversal or additive effects on organisms. However, the understanding of the interactive types of stressors on macroinvertebrate assemblages is still limited. We synthesized 1,087 experimental treatment–control observations extracted from 32 publications to quantify the individual and combined effects of 14 stressors on macroinvertebrates (abundance and richness) and to determine the effect types of paired-stressor interaction. We find that multiple stressors acted mostly through additive effects (84.85%) on freshwater macroinvertebrates. Among the non-additive interactions, antagonistic (7.18%) and reversal (6.41%) effects were more common, while synergistic effects were relatively rare (1.55%). Notably, these interactions often occurred in EPT taxa, with synergistic interactions between increases in fine sediment and temperature often occurring for EPT richness. Additionally, antagonistic and reversal effects were commonly observed between fine sediment increase and either flow decrease or nutrient increase. Our study provides a quantitative basis for accounting for the effect types of multiple stressors in freshwater macroinvertebrate-based biodiversity assessment and ecosystem management. Our study also highlights the consideration should be given to the variability in interactions resulting from different combinations of stressors and emphasizes how realized effects may differ among taxonomic groups.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.018
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.031
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.097

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0180.031
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.004
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEcological IndicatorsSame topicEnvironmental Toxicology and EcotoxicologyFrench-language works237,207