Increased structural covariance of cortical measures in individuals with an at-risk mental state
Bibliographic record
Abstract
An anomalous pattern of structural covariance has been reported in schizophrenia, which has been suggested to represent connectome changes during brain maturation and neuroprogressive processes. It remains unclear whether similar differences exist in a clinical high-risk state for psychosis, and if they are associated with a prodromal phenotype and/or later psychosis onset. This multicenter magnetic resonance imaging study cross-sectionally examined structural covariance in a large at-risk mental state (ARMS) sample with different outcomes. The whole-brain structural covariance of four cortical measures (thickness, area, volume, and gyrification) was assessed in 155 individuals with ARMS, who were subclassified into 26 (16.8 %) with a later psychosis onset (ARMS-P), 44 with persistent subthreshold psychotic symptoms, and 53 with the remission of psychotic symptoms (ARMS-R) during the clinical follow-up, and 191 healthy controls. The relationships of changes in structural covariance with clinical symptoms and cognitive impairments were also investigated in the ARMS subsample. Structural covariance was significantly higher in widespread cortical regions in the ARMS group than in the controls, with each cortical measure having a different pattern in affected cortical regions. The higher structural covariance of the cortical area was partly related to severe suspiciousness-persecutory ideation. Structural covariance was significantly higher, mainly in fronto-parietal gyrification, in the ARMS-P group than in the ARMS-R group. The present results suggest that changes in structural covariance result in psychosis vulnerability and the excessive structural covariance of brain gyrification in ARMS subjects may contribute to their later clinical course.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".