Implementation of next-generation occupant-centric sequences of operation in an office building using supervisory control
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ASHRAE RP-1747 is a CO 2 -based demand-controlled ventilation (DCV) approach which uses trim and respond logic to dynamically adjust variable air volume (VAV) terminal units’ minimum airflow setpoints based on zones’ ventilation requirements . While simulation results and laboratory testing have estimated the impact on heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) systems compared to traditional ventilation, there have been limited applications of RP-1747 in occupied, real-world buildings to date. This paper introduces a real-world implementation of RP-1747 DCV in an institutional office building over an eight-month period, using a supervisory control approach. During this implementation, a complementary temperature setback approach was also developed and employed in the case study building. These changes to the sequences of operation, as well as corrections to other sub-optimal sequences of operation discovered during implementation, resulted in a 36 ± 2 % and 2 ± 6 % reduction in heating and cooling energy use, respectively, while improving per person ventilation rates in the case study. The results aim to contribute to the body of literature on this emerging DCV approach and provide anecdotal evidence of its benefits and interactions with other control logic in a real-world application, while also demonstrating the benefits of supervisory control when implementing complex process control functions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".