External archive guided radial-grid multi objective differential evolution
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Differential evolution (DE) is a robust evolutionary algorithm for solving single-objective and multi-objective optimization problems (MOPs). While numerous multi-objective DE (MODE) variants exist, prior research has primarily focused on parameter control and mutation operators, often neglecting the issue of inadequate population distribution across the objective space. This paper proposes an external archive-guided radial-grid-driven differential evolution for multi-objective optimization (Ar-RGDEMO) to address these challenges. The proposed Ar-RGDEMO incorporates three key components: a novel mutation operator that integrates a radial-grid-driven strategy with a performance metric derived from Pareto front estimation, a truncation procedure that employs Pareto dominance in conjunction with a ranking strategy based on shifted similarity distances between candidate solutions, and an external archive that preserves elite individuals using a clustering approach. Experimental results on four sets of benchmark problems demonstrate that the proposed Ar-RGDEMO exhibits competitive or superior performance compared to seven state-of-the-art algorithms in the literature.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it