A Preliminary Study of the Quality of Seawater at Rasfannu Beach of Male’ City
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The coastal waters of Malé, Maldives, suffer from pollution due to sewage anduntreated waste effluent discharge. Unlike other islands, Malé lacks natural beaches, leading tothe creation of two artificial beaches. These beaches are overcrowded, and concerns about waterquality persist due to poor water circulation and nearby sewage pipes. This study aims to assessthe water quality of Rasfannu, a recently created artificial beach. Water samples were collectedweekly over four weeks and analyzed for physicochemical parameters (pH, turbidity,conductivity, nitrate, nitrite, nitrogen ammonia) and bacteriological parameters (E. coli, fecalcoliform, total coliform). The membrane filtration method was used for bacterial analysis, whileabsorption spectroscopy was used for measuring nitrate, nitrite, and nitrogen ammonia. The pHand conductivity were measured using the Mettler Toledo pH meter. The results were comparedwith guidelines from the World Health Organization (WHO), United States EnvironmentalProtection Agency (USEPA), recreational water guidelines from Canada, California, and theEuropean Union (EU). The hypothesis was that the water at Rasfannu beach is contaminated andunsafe for recreational purposes. However, the results indicated that all parameters fell withinacceptable ranges as per these guidelines, and the water quality index calculated following theNational Sanitation Foundation (NSF) rated the water quality as good. Thus, Rasfannu beach isdeemed safe for recreational use.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it