From Ottawa, for Palestine: Nadia Abu‐Zahra's poetry against genocide
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We are colleagues who came together in Ottawa during a genocide. We came together on our university campus where, despite our collective expertise in the region, critical race theory, and settler-colonialism, we could not discuss the ongoing genocide in Palestine, could not refer to history before October 7th, and could not even call for a ceasefire. We came together in the streets of our city where weekly protests organized by a local coalition marked and still mark the time long past which the bombardment of Gaza should have stopped, as fall became winter, spring, and summer. We came together in each other's houses and over the phone, where we shared good coffee and bad news, to form what Robyn Maynard and Leanne Simpson call “constellations of co-resistance”—relationships that affirm life and world-making in a time of acute violence (Maynard & Simpson, 2022, p. 1). Through poetry, dance, and song, we forged new camaraderies, secret committees, and informal spaces of knowledge-sharing to connect to Palestine in ways that contrast with the racist depictions of Palestinian life as violent, scary, and even worthless that dominated the airwaves and leached into our classrooms (Figure 1). In this piece we position ourselves within and against the continuities of settler-colonial violence that also link us to Palestine and to the stolen land beneath our feet. Here in Canada, in 2024, we do not stand apart from settler-colonialism; we are in the midst of a genocide, and therefore, we eschew traditional methods of writing that do not have the words for what we are seeing Palestinians endure in Gaza. Instead, we present our colleague Nadia Abu-Zahra's poetry along with creative reflections from other colleagues and students to center “humanness, spirit, heart, and creativity into how we come to know” (Absolon, 2022, p. xv). Together we embrace what David McDonald calls the poetics of Palestinian resistance (McDonald, 2013) to subvert the intellectual gaslighting that frames Palestinian experiences of settler colonialism as “exceptional.” We explicitly write to find solace in the thick of this hypocrisy, leaning into the slippages of our positionalities and turning away from the legibility of academic writing in order to push back against the shrinking limits of acceptable speech and attempted suppression of academic freedom on university campuses. Key to our reckoning with this genocidal moment is Refaat Alareer's poem “If I Must Die,” which foretold his assassination by an IDF airstrike on December 6, 2023. The first lines of the poem are, “If I must die, you must live to tell my story.” It goes on to describe the making of a kite—long a symbol of Palestinian resistance—which brings a father's love back to a child in Gaza after he has been killed. Following Alareer's death, white kites, often with the poem inked on one side, became a regular feature of protest marches in Ottawa and other cities worldwide. The poem, which was first published in 2011, thus simultaneously evokes the continuity of the Palestinian genocide and the Palestinian humanity that must transcend it. As his friend, the poet Mosab Abu Toha, wrote shortly after Alareer's death, “what Refaat asked of every one of us was to tell his tale. And his tale and those of others need to change this world, need to stop the genocide. It is not fiction. It is not poetry. It is his life,” (Abu Toha, 2024). This project is rooted in a series of moments when we encountered others—colleagues, students, and neighbors—in the halls and in the streets in acts of Palestinian life-making that defy death and annihilation. One particularly important moment that encouraged us to record these events in writing was a gathering organized by a few brave graduate students in our department who—dancing around a brand-new prohibition on circulating “political” emails over the department listserv—organized an event called, “Palestine: Restoration, Understanding and Communal Healing” on December 7, 2023. When we entered the space they had created, we saw each other across a table strewn with Mahmoud Darwish's poems, a map of historic Palestine, as well as bread and salt. More than just a metaphoric gesture, the students hosting us explained the important role of salt on the table—one often evoked as a covenant of peace and community-making over a meal—to invite us into a space of grief, public intimacy and camaraderie through storytelling, poetry, and reflection. The news of Alareer's death, coming on the heels of this event, further compelled us to heed his call and make these stories known. Although in this piece we represent a collective experience larger than ourselves, the four of us who are listed as authors do so because we want to take responsibility for how we have written about our experiences, presented these poems, and documented these moments. We recognize the fraught racial politics of sounding our experiences here, especially in the context of the stickiness (Ahmed, 2004) of anti-Palestinian racism on campus, and how it sticks differently to Palestinians, and those racialized as being from the region. Our differing bodies have brought us into this writing in different ways, and yet that difference explains why we have come to write this piece, and to do so together. And so, we slip between the I/we, to mark this coming together across and through our differences and most especially, in a difficult time. Below we move through the ethnographic moments that have shaped our collective making and, in sharing the effects that the poems and artwork have had on us, invite others to reflect on the moment and even to join the collective in spirit.1 One did not have to be an expert in international affairs or Palestinian history to know that the Israeli response to Hamas' October 7th incursion was going to be devastatingly violent. The expectation, instilled over 70 years of occupation and explicit Israeli and US policy, was so deeply entrenched that it verged on acceptance. It seemed like everyone around me was just holding their breath, waiting for the bombing to start and, then, waiting for it to end. (We'd talk about it afterwards, assess the damage, listen to the experts situate this latest tragic episode in the violent history of the region, go back to worrying about the next time.) But then it didn't end. It wasn't ever going to end. Raz Segal named it a genocide as early as October 13th (Segal, 2023). Silence became complicity. And still I was speechless: What could I say and how and to whom that would mean anything in the face of what we were witnessing? Of what we were becoming? I felt that silence too. The chill. The terrifying feeling of seeing what is to come, a fissure opening, and the impossibility of speech. Even on campus with folks I thought would talk, could talk, should talk. The fear that the silence sets in as the world watches in real time Palestinian life annihilated. Until I saw that you saw the same thing as I did. Until I saw you too. Until I gathered with others, at a protest organized by a local coalition, and another, until weeks after weeks, more and more came to the streets, and saw more and more of you and you and you. On that Sunday in November, I went to Parliament Hill with you, other friends and my two brothers, who were both visiting from out of town. I had told them that I'd be going to the march, and they had both decided to hop along. I was not sure how they felt about being there, and that uncertainty was eating me. And so we stood on the Hill, listening to the speeches. At some point, I recognized the voice of Nadia. I did not know that Nadia, a renowned Palestinian colleague in International Development and Global Studies who specializes in Palestinian studies, wrote poetry. I turned to my brothers, to tell them I knew her, and saw them both intently listening, I saw that they could see too. Her words cut across the space, her poem offering a way to say otherwise the destruction, the dehumanization, and the way we are part of this story, Canada's complicity. Against the feeling of falling in darkness in a country that could not say the words, Palestine-Genocide-Ceasefire, on November 12, 2023 I marched shoulder to shoulder with my two brothers, and you, alive with the deadly truth of Nadia's off-rhyme. Settler Canada: We understand why you have shied away from seeing what is before all our eyes. We knew you would not abhor genocide – nor honour those on October 7th who died – by listening to the families and those who survived who said: not in our name – we are not on the side of death and destruction – we say this worldwide. There are letters from experts in academia, law and medicine, all duly signed, urging governments to stand up and decide, how they will uphold international law and turn the tide of global leaders’ support for what is so clear and simplified as attacking and cutting the power for babies in incubators aligned now on blankets on the floor, as the hospital on every side is surrounded by the Israeli armed forces who are shooting rounds of live ammunition from snipers into the windows killing a nurse and only intensified the fear and struggle to stay alive. One hundred and twenty health facilities, to be safe, clean and sanitised, 18 hospitals, 40 centres – all instead bombed and trying to ride out the flames and the siege and the travails of births and wounds and learning to thrive to see life and hope and joy despite 193 medical staff killed, 45 ambulances destroyed, a generation demoralised. Never has the United Nations leadership been so horrified, the most staff killed in a month since its creation, 1945. UN shelters, the GPS coordinates they did provide to the Israeli army who tossed warnings aside and bombed the shelters anyway with everyone inside. White phosphorus is banned for this use, the burns never subside, slow deaths of days, as loved ones stand by. The beloved body still smoking even after they expired. Families wrap them in shrouds that countries supplied; shrouds were the substitute for protection and safety fortified. World leaders have shrugged their shoulders and sighed: They stand with Israel and for its favour they've vied: one sends gas, another conduits weapons, another sends destroyers in plain sight. All block refugees: no special scholarships, visas, dignity or pride; these countries determined instead to deride Palestinians’ pleas for humanity, to not be dehumanised. Israel cuts necessities from Gaza like water – a war crime, with rare precedent throughout any time. Even imported water bottles to replace sea brine, Israel bombs those too before they can find the hospitals and parched throats waiting dried from a drop of clean water so cruelly denied. No fuel, no power, no medical supplies, no beans, no fries, no eggs sunny side, no roasts, no vegetables stir-fried, no fragment of scents so strongly desired. And above all this the silence tells us our ears have lied when we thought we heard the Canadian government decried the wrongs, the harms, against humanity the crime, that 880 experts say Israel commits genocide. Israel fabricates stories of beheaded babies and cyanide (which Israel may have used in a refugee camp in 1982 in July). Israel left the Chemical and the a to be from in and like The in and for land and all to our and others Israeli now was falling by do the of the are to has only that Israel and a for all and any the from the United and Canada's and one to a that has been so that Canada, have with all that is an have been after time we you our acts of as we for our loved ones killed with no to We you time and now as as our to international law come and Canada's is instead for a by a that has never the for of its and to say or Israel for killing more the We of the world, of of of and of we are from the We we we will this We will we will our we will We stand across the world We have we will not be We say – all together – we stand We stand We stand for and ceasefire. We stood together the next in where for a of the and Canadian On we the and, as we to to the on along with my The had up and he was and and only by the of with a the of an We as as the was over and trying to our to the more of the protest When the at for the we into a a of and I we had to my to in the me we had our We and the and salt its As the to my we heard the want you say The had long at and were past us by the of their to the streets for the We back into the this time ourselves a my along with us we the a it seemed like could be an opening, with the of the ceasefire. then, we did not know how it would how a would and how more death and would Nadia on Parliament Hill and to in in November we space for a to with Palestine, where gathered at a and space our university The event, and to was out of fear that its would be to or that the would up to stop it 2024). those of us we had on how to that especially for our who would be before an we could not This fear out in how we the event, going through by some of our and only the the of the As we around this in the and with each a before our event was to take a event about Palestine at a campus was by the an before it was to with over left out in the This it it was to discuss Palestine, and the too and too shared us, our and We an to discuss the event But the on being heard and with the event at we felt we it to both our and to On the of the we our until the came some their others coming into this space with a to that we were We could see bodies at the and of Palestinian on the and as they encountered each other in this They were They saw others who could the time we heard Nadia's poem between and on the history of Palestinian resistance and a and from Palestine, for Palestine, and the Palestinian in a of friends and and to we were with the we had And when the event was despite our not to take from the a went colleague asked to decided to take the It wasn't a It was an from with an and a only this could have been a They them up like in One hundred brothers, and They stood shoulder to alive. in We we are we have we We do not we are not we have not we not The of over the to On the of the war on I was on a floor, a and by and for and their the of what we knew was coming we for those of us from the region, we had often the and of in Palestine, this was We both the and to be in the of our humanity before our to the next hospitals, and where we could not our as we students, and killed, or who and like our our like When the and a of and also up the As we the us too. The of this collective so against the silence of the spaces that to as the of the Instead, I the of land with to and of out in classrooms and against the of a settler story, one too to In I was Palestinian Palestinian experiences of and Palestinian death were all an shared secret that we could not out despite the of and in the same And so I my grief, in the classrooms where I about with of on the and death pleas for during the And I how I going to about Palestinian will I that the explicitly from the to the only in a for its to at local to also the land their they too a with and with the dignity to will I to students that even against the most will often on just to that they too are I how I this as it the back its when it in the most talk in with in my when both my each brought a on the same And I the I into the of you at the of a protest on Parliament and reckoning with the of both seeing you, and then of being I wrote this poem a few weeks you into the and of my as we along in of the United in Ottawa during another protest I his by the of his a contrast to what we were of Palestinian in who so like I thought of the out at experts who to yet that Palestinian life is only as on only as I I hope one that my may also find who will live their words than and who will and when it is his time to to to march, to or so of we all know that an were to our that its would us across this shared we all know who will the and who will to As we are to this genocide we too who in our world goes as we are into silence and who would and to our In the we recognize the out by experts who they understand how we can be turned to all despite the bread and salt shared between And so, in this world we our to find who live what they write and will and to their bodies through the Against the from the we each other and we Our students the a a and a series of events during Israeli to through all of with the of students, and staff the with and only to have them by the university a of an on Palestine and the organized by a campus for its was by the a for a for an on the in was and we were told that our was to this event in our the When we decided to the event in our department we that we could not this event on campus, and more that campus would up to and even it As the weeks turned to and the genocidal of war on Gaza as the International of a in the on campus became still more explicit as and other university to a protest racial new of and other were used to events and others from even being organized at In Canada's at a university that its with the and calls to and land before every event, the contrast between speech about the of the us and the and, genocide out before our and live on our was to The is the is in and the United genocide can be named only its settler-colonial are It is no then, that with Palestine has been both on the lines of protests in cities and clear in public that to in with Palestine, 2024). out a do not have to as a about emails on the is too of around the to a genocide on campus, the of we into our university to an event we Palestinian through and We shared and with the of Palestinian and and heard poetry by Palestinian in his We and we Against to life and joy in Palestine, and despite ongoing genocide, Palestinians have a and into the being in of and with the for in refugee in the of the streets, in of the of their with that event, we we could in some ways these life acts that defy death and are to be used a that And to be through acts of and death must a with I Must by Refaat as by 12, (Figure At the event, we had and on each and those in to they saw wrote poetry, and our and their and us of the of joy grief, and In that space, our and colleague the with her and poem (Figure no On the we first this piece in 2024, not a university or in Gaza. We on as the of and department of public safety with to on their campus the of other to protest the ongoing genocide in Palestine and of their at of all of which were also before the of on its on students on the heels of Israeli public with US and to do more to these and protests 2024). students and with as they and in a and their colleagues and 2024). even the Palestinian its camaraderie to In students university they would not be 2024). As in of US in the and of from do not our We have And with us On the same we also in the midst of and in the midst of a hope 2024). I never thought I would live to see or this is for families to and out of the same with thick in and we together to a who bread together do not go to that will be salt between us to the and the their over the same Palestine is now 2024). the Palestine across and in to to its to the up to on is to recognize we are all eating out of the same or for No is why we I This is why we the And so, together we We in the We in we with Palestine is now (Figure
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".