MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404654214 · doi:10.1016/j.tranon.2024.102196

Prostate cancer risk biomarkers from large cohort and prospective metabolomics studies: A systematic review

2024· review· en· W4404654214 on OpenAlex
Yamilé López‐Hernández, Cristina Andrés‐Lacueva, David S. Wishart, Claudia Torres-Calzada, Miriam Martínez‐Huélamo, Enrique Almanza‐Aguilera, Raúl Zamora‐Ros

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueTranslational Oncology · 2024
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMetabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersAgencia Estatal de InvestigaciónInstituto de Salud Carlos IIIAgència de Gestió d'Ajuts Universitaris i de RecercaGeneralitat de CatalunyaCentres de Recerca de CatalunyaInstitució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis AvançatsEuropean Regional Development FundCentro de Investigación Biomédica en Red Fragilidad y Envejecimiento Saludable
KeywordsProstate cancerMedicineProspective cohort studyCancerOncologyCohort studyCohortBiomarkerInternal medicineBioinformaticsBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

• To the best of our knowledge, this is the first systematic review exclusively focused on plasma/serum risk assessment biomarkers for prostate cancer (PCa), selected through a careful examination of large prospective studies. By focusing only in homogeneous studies and similar inclusion criteria and methodologies, we can provide more conclusive results. • We propose a preliminary set of 42 metabolites potentially involved in PCa development and progression. Those metabolites were coincident across at least two large cohort studies included in the present work, where sample collection was done years before PCa diagnosis. Some of these metabolites, such as citrate, may be considered for translational clinical applications. • Correlations between metabolites and dietary sources are evident for few of the detected metabolites, although further investigation is needed to establish the associations between both dietary and environmental exposures, and PCa risk and prognosis. Prostate cancer (PCa) is one of the leading causes of cancer-related deaths among men. The heterogeneous nature of this disease presents challenges in its diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment. Numerous potential predictive, diagnostic, prognostic, and risk assessment biomarkers have been proposed through various population studies. However, to date, no metabolite biomarker has been approved or validated for the diagnosis, prognosis, or risk assessment of PCa. Recognizing that systematic reviews of case reports or heterogenous studies cannot reliably establish causality, this review analyzed 29 large prospective metabolomics studies that utilized harmonized criteria for patient selection, consistent methodologies for blood sample collection and storage, data analysis, and that are available in public repositories. By focusing on these large prospective studies, we identified 42 metabolites that were consistently replicated by different authors and across cohort studies. These metabolites have the potential to serve as PCa risk-assessment or predictive biomarkers. A discussion on their associations with dietary sources or dietary patterns is also provided. Further detailed exploration of the relationship with diet, supplement intake, nutrition patterns, contaminants, lifestyle factors, and pre-existing comorbidities that may predispose individuals to PCa is warranted for future research and validation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.879
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.378
Teacher spread0.351 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it