MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404676536 · doi:10.33137/confrat.v33i2.44371

Archival Sources for the Study of Confraternities in Livorno

2024· article· en· W4404676536 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueConfraternitas · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHistorical and Environmental Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHistory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Documentation for the study of Livornese confraternities is concentrated in a relatively small number of respositories, though gaps certainly remain.The largest single relevant deposit of materials is in the State Archive of Livorno (Archivio di Stato di Livorno, or ASLi), established in 1941 and holding materials formerly held in the city archives.It currently occupies quarters on the third floor of the Palazzo del Governo in the heart of the city. 1 The main archive website offers further directions and instructions on how to access materials: https://archiviodistatolivorno.cultura.gov.it/home.Many of its inventories are available online, and a project to digitize key documents is underway under the oversight of Director Dott.ssaMarianna Volpin.Users planning to consult materials are asked to contact the archive by email a few days in advance for current opening days and hours: as-li@cultura.gov.itThe ASLi has a large fonds holding the records of confraternities active in the city through the early modern period and until the suppressions of 21 March 1785 by Grand Duke Pietro Leopoldo of Tuscany.The inventory for the fonds, which is identified as Confraternite 1599-1785, is #31 in the ASLi Reading Room and is also accessible on-line: https://archiviodistatolivorno. cultura.gov.it/patrimonio/inventari/compagnie-confraternite-e-congregazio-ni-1599-1785.The Confraternite fonds contains 356 documents, organized alphabetically under the forty names that brotherhoods were using at the time of suppression under Grand Duke Leopold in 1785.Given the mergers of brotherhoods that had taken place over the course of the early modern period, the documents themselves cover more than simply forty confraternities.There are great disparities between the holdings for particular groups.The collections of some confraternities, such as S. Barbera dei Bombardieri and the Nativit di S. Maria Vergine, hold dozens of documents, and others such as S. Antonio di Fortezza Vecchia and S. Vincezo Ferreri hold only one.The materials are almost entirely administrative and financial: statutes, minutes of meetings, descriptions of activities, inventories, ledgers of income and expense, etc. although as in any archive there are always unexpected materials that offer a more vivid narrative image of the confraternity's life and activities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.581
Threshold uncertainty score0.820

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it