Bibliographic record
Abstract
Documentation for the study of Livornese confraternities is concentrated in a relatively small number of respositories, though gaps certainly remain.The largest single relevant deposit of materials is in the State Archive of Livorno (Archivio di Stato di Livorno, or ASLi), established in 1941 and holding materials formerly held in the city archives.It currently occupies quarters on the third floor of the Palazzo del Governo in the heart of the city. 1 The main archive website offers further directions and instructions on how to access materials: https://archiviodistatolivorno.cultura.gov.it/home.Many of its inventories are available online, and a project to digitize key documents is underway under the oversight of Director Dott.ssaMarianna Volpin.Users planning to consult materials are asked to contact the archive by email a few days in advance for current opening days and hours: as-li@cultura.gov.itThe ASLi has a large fonds holding the records of confraternities active in the city through the early modern period and until the suppressions of 21 March 1785 by Grand Duke Pietro Leopoldo of Tuscany.The inventory for the fonds, which is identified as Confraternite 1599-1785, is #31 in the ASLi Reading Room and is also accessible on-line: https://archiviodistatolivorno. cultura.gov.it/patrimonio/inventari/compagnie-confraternite-e-congregazio- ni-1599-1785.The Confraternite fonds contains 356 documents, organized alphabetically under the forty names that brotherhoods were using at the time of suppression under Grand Duke Leopold in 1785.Given the mergers of brotherhoods that had taken place over the course of the early modern period, the documents themselves cover more than simply forty confraternities.There are great disparities between the holdings for particular groups.The collections of some confraternities, such as S. Barbera dei Bombardieri and the Natività di S. Maria Vergine, hold dozens of documents, and others such as S. Antonio di Fortezza Vecchia and S. Vincezo Ferreri hold only one.The materials are almost entirely administrative and financial: statutes, minutes of meetings, descriptions of activities, inventories, ledgers of income and expense, etc. although as in any archive there are always unexpected materials that offer a more vivid narrative image of the confraternity's life and activities.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.028 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.033 | 0.035 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.008 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.029 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".