MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404688012 · doi:10.1109/ojcoms.2024.3506219

User-Centric Multi-Dimensional Modulation for Receiver Operational Cost Minimization in Non-Orthogonal Domains

2024· article· en· W4404688012 on OpenAlexaff
Thakshanth Uthayakumar, Xianbin Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Open Journal of the Communications Society · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPAPR reduction in OFDM
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsModulation (music)MinificationComputer scienceElectronic engineeringEngineeringAcousticsPhysicsWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The perpetual efforts in supporting ever-growing QoS requirements have brought new challenges in 5G advanced and 6G networks such as increased spatial channel correlation, large delaydoppler spread, higher carrier frequency offset, and more complex multi-path signals. As a result, the orthogonality among spatial, time-frequency, and delay-doppler domain radio resources is often destroyed leading to non-orthogonal radio resources a common paradigm for modulation in next-generation networks. Such non-orthogonality degrees have become both transmitter-receiver pair specific and domain specific due to diverse channel conditions perceived by the UE involved. Furthermore, the operational cost of restoring orthogonality and demodulation varies across domains due to different synchronization and interference cancelation capabilities of receiver in different domains. To tackle these issues, we propose user-centric multi-dimensional modulation (UC-MDM) aiming to minimize receiver costs while supporting necessary data rates. Our situation-aware, cost-conscious UC-MDM optimizes resource separation across spatial, time-frequency, and delay-doppler domains, utilizing optimal resource combinations through multidimensional modulation in either spatial-time-frequency or spatial-delay-doppler domains. Simulation results under simultaneously varied domain specific non-orthogonality degrees validate that UC-MDM achieves required data rate with less operational cost from user-device compared to MIMO-OFDM and MIMO-OTFS systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.446
Threshold uncertainty score0.400

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.327
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Open Journal of the Communications SocietySame topicPAPR reduction in OFDMFrench-language works237,207