MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Lab-on-Chip Total Alkalinity Sensor for Highly Resolved, Efficient, and Long-Term Monitoring, Reporting, and Verification of Ocean Alkalinity Enhancement

2024· article· en· W4404688862 on OpenAlexaffabout
Shahrooz Motahari, Colin Sonnichsen, Alireza Zabihihesari, Will Burt, Vincent J. Sieben

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemical Engineering
TopicAnalytical Chemistry and Sensors
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAlkalinityTerm (time)ChipEnvironmental scienceRemote sensingComputer scienceChemistryTelecommunicationsPhysicsGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Increasing atmospheric CO2from human activities is causing shifts in marine chemical and biological cycles. Ocean Alkalinity Enhancement (OAE) shows promise as a potential carbon dioxide removal (CDR) solution. However, comprehensive measurement, reporting, and verification (MRV) of OAE is required for the development and deployment of OAE as a CDR technology. The current observational approaches are not yet standardized or readily available to assess early-stage field trials. In this study, we report using a microfluidic lab-on-a-chip total alkalinity sensor in an OAE field experiment conducted in Tuft's Cove, Halifax, Canada to monitor seawater alkalinity during and after the addition of an alkaline mineral. To the authors knowledge, this is the first reported lab-on-chip sensor used in support of OAE mCDR. Over a 40-day period, our sensor collected 374 measurements along with 60 on-board standard measurements with the measurement frequency of one measurement per three hours. We report a precision of 9.2 μmol/kg which is the standard deviation of the CRM measurements. The data obtained during this trial demonstrates the capability of our technology for total alkalinity monitoring at OAE sites for long periods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAnalytical Chemistry and SensorsFrench-language works237,207