MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Computational generation of tailored radionuclide libraries for alpha-particle and gamma-ray spectrometry

2024· article· en· W4404692841 on OpenAlexfundno aff
J. S. Jang

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review Research · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicRadiation Detection and Scintillator Technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersJapan Society for the Promotion of ScienceUniversity of TokyoSimon Fraser UniversityTRIUMF
KeywordsRadionuclideAlpha particleGamma ray spectrometryMass spectrometryAlpha (finance)RadiochemistryParticle (ecology)Nuclear engineeringNuclear physicsEnvironmental scienceComputer sciencePhysicsChemistryEngineeringGeologyMathematicsStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Radionuclide identification is a radioanalytical method employed in various scientific disciplines that utilize alpha-particle or gamma-ray spectrometric assays, ranging from astrophysics to nuclear medicine. Radionuclide libraries in conventional radionuclide identification systems are crafted in a manual fashion, accompanying labor-intensive and error-prone user tasks and hindering library customization. This research presents a computational algorithm and the architecture of its dedicated software that can automatically generate tailored radionuclide libraries. Progenitor-progeny recurrence relations were modeled to enable recursive computation of radionuclide subsets. This theoretical concept was incorporated into open-source software called and validated against four actinide decay series and 12 radioactive substances, including a uranium-glazed legacy Fiestaware, natural uranium and thorium sources, a <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <a:mmultiscripts> <a:mi>Ra</a:mi> <a:mprescripts/> <a:none/> <a:mn>226</a:mn> </a:mmultiscripts> </a:math> sample, and the medical radionuclides <b:math xmlns:b="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <b:mmultiscripts> <b:mi>Ac</b:mi> <b:mprescripts/> <b:none/> <b:mn>225</b:mn> </b:mmultiscripts> <b:mo>,</b:mo> <b:mo> </b:mo> <b:mmultiscripts> <b:mi>Lu</b:mi> <b:mprescripts/> <b:none/> <b:mn>177</b:mn> </b:mmultiscripts> </b:math> , and <c:math xmlns:c="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <c:mmultiscripts> <c:mi>Tc</c:mi> <c:mprescripts/> <c:none/> <c:mrow> <c:mn>99</c:mn> <c:mi>m</c:mi> </c:mrow> </c:mmultiscripts> </c:math> . The developed algorithm yielded radionuclide libraries for all the tested specimens within minutes, demonstrating its efficiency and applicability across diverse scenarios. The proposed approach introduces a framework for computerized radionuclide library generation, thereby trivializing library-driven radionuclide identification and facilitating the spectral recognition of unregistered radionuclides in radiation spectrometry. Published by the American Physical Society 2024

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.699
Threshold uncertainty score0.228

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.098
GPT teacher head0.411
Teacher spread0.313 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review ResearchSame topicRadiation Detection and Scintillator TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207