MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404695348 · doi:10.1190/geo2024-0202.1

Rapid-repeat time-lapse vertical seismic profile imaging of CO2 injection

2024· article· en· W4404695348 on OpenAlexafffund
Xiaohui Cai, Qi Hu, K. A. Innanen, Scott Keating, Matthew Eaid, Marie Macquet, Don C. Lawton

Bibliographic record

VenueGeophysics · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicSeismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques
Canadian institutionsBP (Canada)Carbon Management CanadaAlberta Environment and Protected AreasUniversity of CalgaryAlberta Energy
FundersCanadian Network for Research and Innovation in Machining Technology, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsGeologyGeophysical imagingSeismologyVertical seismic profileGeodesyGeophysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT In a carbon capture and storage (CCS) project, monitoring CO2 during the injection period is crucial for ensuring the safety and effectiveness of the injection process. The real-time observation of CO2 behavior allows for adjustments to the injection parameters to enhance performance and enables the refinement of the reservoir simulation models to predict plume migration accurately. Achieving this with seismic surveys requires significantly shorter intervals between the surveys compared with the conventional monthly or yearly timescales. This study aims to identify an effective seismic monitoring method, encompassing acquisition design and an imaging technique, for capturing the short-term, dynamic subsurface changes resulting from CO2 injection. We present images generated through elastic full-waveform inversion applied to rapidly repeated time-lapse vertical seismic profile (VSP) field data. The data are acquired using a fixed source shooting across an injection plume at approximately 15 min intervals over several days. These images, created from a combination of sparse geophone data and densely distributed acoustic sensing (DAS) data, provide clear snapshots of transient subsurface changes near the injection well. The results are further validated using a synthetic inversion experiment, demonstrating that the combined geophone and DAS-VSP approach offers a cost-effective and informative monitoring solution for CCS projects.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.923
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeophysicsSame topicSeismic Imaging and Inversion TechniquesFrench-language works237,207