MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404711907 · doi:10.1063/5.0239376

A novel reservoir simulation model based on physics informed neural networks

2024· article· en· W4404711907 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysics of Fluids · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicModel Reduction and Neural Networks
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsPhysicsArtificial neural networkStatistical physicsReservoir computingArtificial intelligenceRecurrent neural network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Surrogate models are widely used for reservoir simulations in the petroleum industry to improve computational efficiency. However, the traditional surrogate model mainly relies on the data collected from production wells (e.g., well bottom pressure data and well production data) and ignores the physical mechanism of underground fluid flow; therefore, the surrogate model will be invalid in the case of insufficient data samples. In response to these challenges, a Hard-Soft physics informed neural network (HS-PINN) was proposed to simulate pressure fluctuations around producing wells without relying on any labeled data, where two coupled fully connected neural networks were comprised to control the Hard and Soft constraint conditions. Specifically, in the “Soft Constraint” condition, we employ a modified Lorentz function to incorporate underground flow theory and permeability fields into the loss function. Meanwhile, in the “Hard Constraint” condition, we incorporate an enforcement function in the “output layer” to ensure the network outputs satisfy the boundary and initial conditions. To demonstrate the HS-PINN model's robustness and accuracy abilities, we tested it for single and multi-well production in both noisy low-fidelity and high-fidelity geologic reservoir environments, and the HS-PINN prediction errors were less than 1% in both cases compared to simulation results by the commercial software “COMSOL.” Additionally, we assessed the impacts of varying well interference intensities, adjustments in collocation points counts within the control equations, and diverse geological characteristics on model performance to validate the generalization and stability of HS-PINN. Moreover, the HS-PINN-based surrogate model significantly improves the efficiency of uncertainty quantification tasks compared to simulation-based approaches, requiring only 8% of the computational time. The deep-learning surrogate models developed in this work offer a novel and efficient approach for simulating reservoir development.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.964
Threshold uncertainty score0.876

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it