Identification of dominant natural sources of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in river sediments in Alberta
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Sediment collected from the rivers of southern Alberta, Canada, presents patterns of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) that demonstrate a varied origin within the Rocky Mountains. An influx of PAHs from sub-bituminous coal sources from erosional processes as the river exit the mountains dominates the pattern of PAHs in the river sediment across the prairies to the Alberta-Saskatchewan border (a distance of 750 km for the Red Deer River and 925 km for the Bow River) continues much further downstream. The concentrations of PAHs are similar to the well-studied Athabasca River in the Alberta Oil Sands Region. Although these results relate to rivers flowing east from the Rocky Mountains in Canada, it is likely that coal-sourced PAHs will contribute to any river where erosion of coal formations is possible within the watershed. A distinctive natural pattern of strongly pyrogenic PAHs from nearby thermal hot springs was also discovered near Banff. Natural pyrogenic PAH sources, aside from wildfires, are uncommon and generally related to hydrothermal vents and igneous intrusions into source rocks. This is the first time the authors are aware of sediment from a thermal spring presenting such PAH patterns.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it