MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404719260 · doi:10.1038/s41597-024-04101-6

A high-resolution satellite-based solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence dataset for China from 2000 to 2022

2024· article· en· W4404719260 on OpenAlexaff
Shiyu Tao, Jing M. Chen, Zhaoying Zhang, Yongguang Zhang, Weimin Ju, Tingting Zhu, Linsheng Wu, Yunfei Wu, Xiaoyan Kang

Bibliographic record

VenueScientific Data · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicRemote Sensing in Agriculture
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRemote sensingEnvironmental scienceSatellitePrimary productionImage resolutionAtmospheric sciencesMeteorologyEcosystemComputer scienceGeographyGeologyPhysicsEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF) serves as a valuable proxy for photosynthesis. The TROPOspheric Monitoring Instrument (TROPOMI) aboard the Copernicus Sentinel-5P mission offers nearly global coverage with a fine spectral resolution for reliable SIF retrieval. However, the present satellite-derived SIF datasets are accessible only at coarse spatial resolutions, constraining its applications at fine scales. Here, we utilized a weighted stacking algorithm to generate a high spatial resolution SIF dataset (500 m, 8-day) in China (HCSIF) from 2000 to 2022 from the TROPOMI with a spatial resolution at a nadir of 3.5 km by 5.6–7 km. Our algorithm demonstrated high accuracy on validation datasets (R 2 = 0.87, RMSE = 0.057 mW/m 2 /nm/sr). The HCSIF dataset was evaluated against OCO-2 SIF, GOME-2 SIF tower-based measurements of SIF, and gross primary productivity (GPP) from flux towers. We expect this dataset can potentially advance the understanding of fine-scale terrestrial ecological processes, allowing for monitoring of ecosystem biodiversity and precise assessment of crop health, productivity, and stress levels in the long term.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.274
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScientific DataSame topicRemote Sensing in AgricultureFrench-language works237,207