Characteristics of Patients With Adult-Onset Dermatomyositis at 2 Tertiary Care Centres in Ontario, Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dermatomyositis (DM) is an idiopathic inflammatory myopathy characterized by progressive muscle weakness and distinctive cutaneous findings. The exact incidence and prevalence of DM in the general population is largely unknown, and data on demographic and clinical features in patients in Canada are lacking. This study aimed to comprehensively evaluate the patients with DM in Southwestern Ontario, Canada. A retrospective chart review was conducted for patients with adult-onset DM at 2 tertiary care centres in Ontario, Canada, over a 13 year period. One hundred fourteen patients were included. The mean age was 59, and 80% of patients were female. Skin and muscle involvement coincided in 63% of patients, while skin predated muscle involvement in 11%. Most common characteristic skin manifestations included Gottron's papules (69%), Heliotrope sign (66%), V sign (61%), and Shawl sign (56%). Among the 114 patients, 88 (77%) were myopathic while 26/114 (23%) were clinically amyopathic dermatomyositis. In the myopathic type, upper extremity weakness, lower extremity weakness, and dysphagia were present in 87%, 81%, and 29% of patients, respectively. Elevated creatine kinase, C-reactive protein, lactate dehydrogenase, and erythrocyte sedimentation rate were found in 66%, 35%, 33%, and 32%, respectively. Lung disease was reported in 39%, particularly interstitial lung disease. Other associated features included malignancy, cardiovascular disease, and less commonly gastrointestinal disease. DM is a multifaceted autoimmune disease with distinct cutaneous and muscular findings. Our study results align with the growing body of evidence supporting DM as a complex systemic disease with the potential involvement of other organs such as the pulmonary, cardiovascular, and gastrointestinal systems.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".