MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404730284 · doi:10.1093/brain/awae387

Cortico-thalamic tremor circuits and their associations with deep brain stimulation effects in essential tremor

2024· article· en· W4404730284 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Shenghong He, Timothy O. West, Fernando Rodriguez Plazas, Laura Wehmeyer, Alek Pogosyan, Alceste Deli, Christoph Wiest, Damian M. Herz, Pablo Andrade, Fahd Baig, Michael G. Hart, Francesca Morgante, James J. FitzGerald, Michael T. Barbe, Veerle Visser‐Vandewalle, Alexander L. Green, Erlick Pereira, Hayriye Cagnan, Huiling Tan

Bibliographic record

VenueBrain · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeurological disorders and treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMedical Research CouncilMedical Research Council CanadaGuarantors of BrainRoyal Society
KeywordsEssential tremorDeep brain stimulationThalamusNeuroscienceIntention tremorNeuromodulationMotor cortexSubthalamic nucleusThalamic stimulatorPsychologyMovement disordersStimulationMedicineParkinson's diseaseAtaxia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Essential tremor is one of the most common movement disorders in adults. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the ventralis intermediate nucleus of the thalamus and/or the posterior subthalamic area has been shown to provide significant tremor suppression in patients with essential tremor, but with significant inter-patient variability and habituation to the stimulation. Several non-invasive neuromodulation techniques targeting other parts of the CNS, including cerebellar, motor cortex or peripheral nerves, have also been developed for treating essential tremor, but the clinical outcomes remain inconsistent. Existing studies suggest that pathology in essential tremor might emerge from multiple cortical and subcortical areas, but its exact mechanisms remain unclear. By simultaneously capturing neural activities from motor cortices and thalami and recording hand tremor signals via accelerometers in 15 human subjects who had undergone lead implantations for DBS, we systematically characterized the efferent and afferent cortico-thalamic tremor networks. Through the comparisons of these network characteristics and tremor amplitude between DBS off and on conditions, we also investigated the associations between different tremor network characteristics and the magnitude of the DBS effect. Our findings implicate the thalamus, specifically the contralateral hemisphere, as the primary generator of tremor in essential tremor, also with a significant contribution of the ipsilateral hemisphere. Although there is no direct correlation between the cortico-tremor connectivity and tremor power or reduced tremor by DBS, the strength of connectivity from the motor cortex to the thalamus and vice versa at tremor frequency predicts baseline tremor power and effect of DBS. Interestingly, there is no correlation between these two connectivity pathways themselves, suggesting that, independent of the subcortical pathway, the motor cortex appears to play a relatively distinct role, possibly mediated through an afferent/feedback loop in the propagation of tremor. DBS has a greater clinical effect in those with stronger cortico-thalamo-tremor connectivity involving the contralateral thalamus, which is also associated with bigger and more stable tremor measured with an accelerometer. Interestingly, stronger cross-hemisphere coupling between left and right thalami is associated with more unstable tremor. This study provides important insights for a better understanding of the cortico-thalamic tremor-generating network and its implication for the development of patient-specific therapeutic approaches for essential tremor.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.516
Threshold uncertainty score0.375

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBrainSame topicNeurological disorders and treatmentsFrench-language works237,207