MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404730321 · doi:10.1016/j.jsurg.2024.103350

Beyond Textbooks: Interactive Learning of Biomechanical Principles of Osteosynthesis with an Online Tool for Orthopaedic Residents

2024· article· en· W4404730321 on OpenAlexaff
Lionel Llano, Dominic Mischler, Danilo Taype, Sandipan Chatterjee, Monica Ghidinelli, Markku Nousiainen, Simon Lambert, П. Варга

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of surgical education · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMusculoskeletal Disorders and Rehabilitation
Canadian institutionsHealth Sciences CentreUniversity of TorontoSunnybrook Health Science Centre
FundersAO Foundation
KeywordsOsteosynthesisOnline learningPsychologyComputer scienceMedicineMultimediaOrthodontics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed at evaluating the effectiveness of an online interactive biomechanical teaching tool called OSapp. Our main hypothesis was that through the presentation of appropriate science-based content in an interactive, self-directed learning environment familiar to residents the OSapp could significantly improve the knowledge, comprehension, and retention of clinically relevant biomechanical principles of osteosynthesis. DESIGN: Thirty-one orthopaedic residents from the same institution were enrolled. Their knowledge of basic biomechanical principles of osteosynthesis was assessed using 24 multiple-choice questions, in 3 assessment rounds: at baseline; directly after a 1-week self-directed OSapp-based learning period; and 2 months later to measure retention. Results of the junior (1-3 years) and senior (4-5 years) resident groups were compared. SETTING: Orthopaedics and Traumatology Department, Italian Hospital of Buenos Aires, Argentina. PARTICIPANTS: Orthopaedic residents of the same Department at the time of investigation, including residency years 1 to 5. RESULTS: Twenty-eight participants completed all 3 assessment rounds. Assessment scores significantly improved after the intervention compared to baseline (p < 0.05) and did not decline after 2 months (p > 0.99). Both juniors and seniors showed significant knowledge gain (p < 0.05) that was retained (p > 0.99). Although seniors were better than juniors at baseline (p ≤ 0.01) and postintervention (p < 0.05), after the intervention, juniors reached the level of baseline seniors (p > 0.21). No difference was observed between the 2 groups after 2 months (p > 0.21). CONCLUSIONS: Self-directed learning with the interactive 3D models available in the freely available online tool OSapp led to a significant and sustained improvement of residents' knowledge and understanding of the biomechanical principles of osteosynthesis. Utilizing OSapp in surgical education could help to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of training and may thus lead to decreased fracture treatment complications including failure of osteosyntheses.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.879
Threshold uncertainty score0.210

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.332
Teacher spread0.313 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of surgical educationSame topicMusculoskeletal Disorders and RehabilitationFrench-language works237,207