MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4404730541 · doi:10.1101/2024.11.24.24317863

Intracranial Atherosclerotic Disease in Acute Ischemic Stroke: Clinical Predictors, Imaging Profiles, and Treatment Outcomes: An Analysis from RITE Registry

2024· preprint· en· W4404730541 on OpenAlexaff
Fawaz F Alotaibi, Michael Mlynash, Nowar Z. AlAbidien, Mohammed S. Alqahtani, Hussain Bin Amir, Ammar Alkawi, Abdulrahman Alreshaid, Mohamed Alzawahmah, Adel Alhazzani, Hani Mohammed Alabdaly, Abdulmajeed Alanazi, Nouf Almansour, Gregory W. Albers, Ashfaq Shuaib, Fahad Al-Ajlan

Bibliographic record

VenuemedRxiv · 2024
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineDiseaseCardiologyAcute strokeStroke (engine)Internal medicineIschemic strokeNeuroimagingEndovascular treatmentRadiologyIschemiaAneurysmTissue plasminogen activator

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Intracranial atherosclerotic disease (ICAD) is a leading cause of ischemic stroke worldwide, with a significant prevalence in specific populations. This study aims to compare the clinical characteristics, imaging profiles, and outcomes of stroke patients with large vessel occlusion (LVO) caused by ICAD versus non-ICAD etiologies, particularly in those transferred for endovascular treatment (EVT). Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted using data from the Riyadh Thrombectomy Registry, including 219 patients with acute ischemic stroke who underwent EVT between January 2019 and March 2024. Clinical, demographic, and imaging data were collected and compared between ICAD and non-ICAD groups. Imaging modalities included computed tomography perfusion (CTP) and angiography, with key metrics such as the hypoperfusion intensity ratio (HIR) and cerebral blood volume (CBV) index evaluated for prognostic utility. Results Patients with ICAD were older and demonstrated a higher prevalence of vascular risk factors. ICAD patients presented with better ASPECTS scores, smaller ischemic core volumes, and higher mismatch ratios, reflecting better collateral circulation. However, despite favorable imaging profiles, ICAD patients exhibited higher mortality rates, particularly in cases involving basilar artery occlusion. HIR and CBV indices demonstrated modest diagnostic performance in distinguishing ICAD from non-ICAD, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.62 for HIR and 0.57 for CBV. Conclusions ICAD patients undergoing EVT showed distinct clinical and imaging characteristics compared to non-ICAD patients. Despite better collateral circulation, ICAD is associated with higher mortality, especially in posterior circulation strokes. Further research is required to optimize EVT strategies and explore adjunctive therapies tailored to this challenging patient population.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuemedRxiv→Same topicCerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases→French-language works237,207→