MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404733271 · doi:10.1016/j.addma.2024.104581

Understanding residual stress in functionally graded directed energy deposition

2024· article· en· W4404733271 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueAdditive manufacturing · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMetal and Thin Film Mechanics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Foundation for Innovation
KeywordsMaterials scienceResidual stressStress (linguistics)Deposition (geology)Composite materialEnergy (signal processing)Engineering physicsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Residual stress within functionally graded material (FGM) fabricated by directed energy deposition (DED) limits their industrial application. This paper presents a new model for predicting residual stress in the DED-built FGM thin-wall structures, accommodating any DED process configurations or material combinations. To validate this model, SS316/IN718 FGM thin-wall structures were produced by powder-fed laser DED processes, and residual stresses along the longitudinal direction were measured by X-ray diffraction techniques . Under the same deposition parameters , five material composition transition paths from SS316 to IN718 were employed to quantify the effect of material mixing properties on the residual stress distribution . One path was based on the designed weight percentages of SS316 and IN718 in each deposition layer, while the other four paths were determined by detecting the average weight ratios of four elements: iron (Fe), nickel (Ni), niobium (Nb) and titanium (Ti). The predicted residual stress profiles agreed with the measurements, with the maximum normalized root mean squared error (NRMSE) of 26.42 % observed in Nb-based predictions. The validated model was further extended to investigate residual stress distribution in two types of FGM thin-wall structures featured by tilted material transition regions: vertical- and horizontal-dominant walls. Results suggest that maximum tensile residual stresses are proportionally related to the material gradient angle ( θ 1 ) in vertical-dominant walls, while increasing the material gradient angle ( θ 2 ) in horizontal-dominant walls results in more compressive residual stresses at the FGM’s top surface. Based on a comprehensive understanding of the process mechanism using this practical model, it is now possible to propose novel deposition strategies that allow the material specification to be met while offering a reduced residual stress solution.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.798
Threshold uncertainty score0.669

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.170 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it