MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404733454 · doi:10.2196/63260

Development of an eHealth Intervention in Pediatric Home Infusion Therapy: Interview Study of Needs and Preferences of Parents and Health Care Professionals

2024· article· en· W4404733454 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJMIR Pediatrics and Parenting · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIntravenous Infusion Technology and Safety
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersEuropean Regional Development FundForskningsrådet om Hälsa, Arbetsliv och Välfärd
KeywordsPreprinteHealthIntervention (counseling)Qualitative researchHealth careHealth professionalsMedicinePsychologyNursingFamily medicineSociologyComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: With the provision of home infusion therapy in children with acute or long-term illness on the rise, eHealth technologies have the potential to bridge the transition between hospital and home. However, eHealth interventions intended to support parents in managing home infusion therapy are sparse. Gaining insight into the needs and experiences of parents and health care professionals is crucial to developing feasible and sustainable eHealth interventions that target their needs. This study describes the first phase of a research study designed to develop and evaluate an eHealth intervention to support home infusion therapy. Objective: This study aimed to identify the experiences and needs of parents and health care professionals during home infusion therapy and their preferences for digital features in a future eHealth intervention. Methods: A qualitative study was conducted at 3 pediatric departments at a university hospital in Denmark. We individually interviewed 17 parents of 14 children who had received home infusion therapy with a portable pump. In addition, 5 focus groups were conducted with 15 health care professionals. We conducted a qualitative content analysis of the data, which we collected from February to July 2020. Results: We identified 6 subthemes that we merged into 3 main themes: increasing safe self-management at home; adapting information and responsibility to individual changing needs; and requesting digital features to ensure skill level, safety, and quality of care. The analysis showed that parents and health care professionals had corresponding needs and preferences, for example, a need for a high sense of safety and easier ways to communicate during home infusion therapy. Both groups emphasized the need for digital features to improve problem-solving and communication as a supplement to existing care to promote a safe environment, self-management, and quality of care. A vital issue was that an eHealth intervention should be aligned with the workflow of health care professionals and comply with regulations regarding confidentiality in communication and data sharing. Conclusions: Our study highlights the needs that parents and health care professionals have for increased safety and easier access to communication when receiving and providing home infusion therapy. The findings will be used to help develop an eHealth intervention supporting home infusion therapy tailored to individual needs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.564
Threshold uncertainty score0.407

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.319
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it