MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404739973 · doi:10.1109/jssc.2024.3499914

Modular DR- and CMR-Boosted Artifact-Resilient EEG Headset With Distributed Pulse-Based Feature Extraction and Neuro-Inspired Boosted-SVM Classifier

2024· article· en· W4404739973 on OpenAlexafffund
Alireza Dabbaghian, Hossein Kassiri

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicEEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
Canadian institutionsYork University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsHeadsetArtificial intelligenceSupport vector machineFeature extractionPattern recognition (psychology)Computer scienceClassifier (UML)Modular designElectroencephalographyArtifact (error)Speech recognitionPsychologyNeuroscience

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article presents the design, development, and experimental testing of a flexible, modular electroencephalography (EEG) headset for long-term epilepsy monitoring and individualized treatment. System- and circuit-level techniques are employed to improve energy efficiency while ensuring high-quality EEG recordings and accurate seizure detection. The wearable prototype includes digital active electrodes (DAEs) for high-dynamic-range (DR) recording, motion artifact removal (MAR), and feature extraction (FE), along with a central backend (BE) for patient-specific classification, wireless connectivity, and common-mode rejection (CMR) boosting. DAEs communicate through a time-shared data bus, minimizing wires and enabling flexible electrode placement, maximizing system scalability. Each DAE enhances recording quality with: 1) calibrated CMR boosting (>80-dB common-mode rejection ratio (CMRR) with 1-$M\Omega $AE-to-AE mismatch); 2) SC notch filtering for power-line noise; 3) real-time electrode-tissue impedance (ETI) measurement for MAR and dc correction; and 4) an autoranging mechanism with 17-dB DR enhancement. In-AE FE cuts AE-to-BE communication power by 99.1%, while pulse-based frequency sampling reduces FE power by 92.1%. A neuromorphic multiplier-less adaptively boosted support vector machine (SVM) maintains high detection accuracy with 97.6% less classification power than conventional designs. The chip was implemented in 180-nm CMOS, and the wearable system components (DAE, wireless, and CMR boards) were miniaturized. Experimental testing showed IIRN ($0.64~\mu V_{\text {rms}}$, 0.5–100 Hz), adjustable gain/bandwidth, DR (80 dB), SNDR (74.5 dB), and CMRR (89.2 dB without mismatch, >80 dB with mismatch). Measurement results also confirm the system’s effectiveness in motion artifact estimation and removal. In vivo measurements demonstrate the system’s efficacy and latency in detecting neurologically relevant events. Seizure detection results (96.4% sensitivity, 0.41 FPR, 1-s latency, zero SRAM usage) on prerecorded EEG data from 21 patients are also reported. The system is compared to state-of-the-art EEG recording and seizure detection systems, highlighting its advantages.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Journal of Solid-State CircuitsSame topicEEG and Brain-Computer InterfacesFrench-language works237,207