MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404751182 · doi:10.4244/eij-d-24-00951

Early outcomes of the novel Myval THV series compared to SAPIEN THV series and Evolut THV series in individuals with severe aortic stenosis

2025· article· en· W4404751182 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Niels van Royen, Ignacio J. Amat‐Santos, Martin Hudec, Matjaž Bunc, Alexander Ijsselmuiden, Peep Laanmets, Daniel Unić, Béla Merkely, Renicus S. Hermanides, Vlasis Ninios, Marcin Protasiewicz, Benno J. Rensing, Pedro Martín, Fausto Feres, Manuel Sousa, Éric Van Belle, Axel Linke, Alfonso Ielasi, Matteo Montorfano, Mark Webster, Konstantinos Toutouzas, Emmanuel Teíger, Francesco Bedogni, Michiel Voskuil, Manuel Pan, Oskar Angerås, Jürgen Rothe, Ivica Kristić, Vicente Peral, Ben J L Van den Branden, Dirk Westermann, Bárbara Bellini, Mario García‐Gómez, Akihiro Tobe, Tsung‐Ying Tsai, Scot Garg, Ashokkumar Thakkar, Udita Chandra, Marie‐Claude Morice, Osama Soliman, Yoshinobu Onuma, Patrick W. Serruys, Andreas Baumbach

Bibliographic record

VenueEuroIntervention · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersDaiichi Sankyo EuropeMedizinische Fakultät der Albert-Ludwigs-Universität FreiburgMicroPortCentro de Investigación Biomédica en Red Enfermedades CardiovascularesUniwersytet Medyczny im. Piastów Slaskich we WroclawiuUniversidad de CórdobaVifor PharmaMaastricht Universitair Medisch CentrumInstituto de Salud Carlos IIIAmgenRadboud UniversiteitGöteborgs UniversitetFukuda Foundation for Medical TechnologySemmelweis EgyetemSahlgrenska UniversitetssjukhusetCanada Excellence Research Chairs, Government of CanadaUniversity of GalwayAbiomedJenaValvePfizerUniversity of Central LancashireBoston Scientific CorporationHellenic Society of CardiologyCleveland ClinicBristol-Myers SquibbEli Lilly and CompanyAstraZenecaQueen Mary University of LondonCSL BehringAlbert-Ludwigs-Universität FreiburgUniversiteit MaastrichtEdwards Lifesciences
KeywordsMedicineSeries (stratigraphy)StenosisCardiologyCase seriesInternal medicineAortic valve stenosisSurgeryPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: There are limited head-to-head randomised trials comparing the performance of different transcatheter heart valves (THVs). AIMS: We aimed to evaluate the non-inferiority of the balloon-expandable Myval THV series compared to the balloon-expandable SAPIEN THV series or the self-expanding Evolut THV series. METHODS: The LANDMARK trial randomised 768 patients in a 1:1 ratio, (Myval THV series [n=384] vs contemporary series with 50% SAPIEN THV series [n=192] and 50% Evolut THV series [n=192]). The non-inferiority of Myval over the SAPIEN or Evolut THV series in terms of the 30-day primary composite safety and effectiveness endpoint as per the third Valve Academic Research Consortium (VARC-3) was tested in an intention-to-treat population with a predefined statistical power of 80% (1-sided alpha of 5%) for a non-inferiority margin of 10.44%. RESULTS: The Myval THV series achieved non-inferiority for the primary composite endpoint over the SAPIEN THV series (24.7% vs 24.1%, risk difference [95% confidence interval {CI}]: 0.6% [not applicable {NA} to 8.0]; p=0.0033) and the Evolut THV series (24.7% vs 30.0%, risk difference [95% CI]: -5.3% [NA to 2.5]; p<0.0001). The incidences of pacemaker implantation were comparable (Myval THV series: 15.0%, SAPIEN THV series: 17.3%, Evolut THV series: 16.8%). At 30 days, the mean pressure gradient and effective orifice area were significantly better with the Myval THV series compared to the SAPIEN THV series (p<0.0001) and better with the Evolut THV series than with the Myval THV series (p<0.0001). At 30 days, the proportion of moderate to severe prosthetic valve regurgitation was numerically higher with the Evolut THV series compared to the Myval THV series (7.4% vs 3.4%; p=0.06), while not significantly different between the Myval THV series and the SAPIEN THV series (3.4% vs 1.6%; p=0.32). CONCLUSIONS: The Myval THV series is non-inferior to the SAPIEN THV series and the Evolut THV series in terms of the primary composite endpoint at 30 days. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04275726; EudraCT number 2020-000,137-40.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.597

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuroInterventionSame topicCardiac Valve Diseases and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207