S1: Crossing Oceans and Connecting People to Promote the Human Rights of Older People
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ILC Canada), Canadian Coalition Against Ageism (CCAA), and Rights of Older Persons Australia (ROPA), IPA members have emerged as global leaders in advocating for integration of human rights-based mental health care for older persons.Advocacy efforts have spanned grassroots and global strategies.At the grassroots level, IPA has championed the seamless integration of human rights principles into clinical practice, demonstrating a commitment to action.Globally, IPA has engaged in advocacy for a United Nations (UN) convention on the rights of older persons, notably through active participation in UN Open Ended Working Group on Aging (OEWGA).This symposium showcases a diverse array of papers exemplifying these dual approaches.Papers on grassroots strategies include: (i) "Walking the Talk:20 Ways to Embed Human Rights in Everyday Clinical Practice" (Carmelle Peisah) provide practical guidance for clinicians; (ii) "The UN Decade's and our own efforts to address ageism" (Liat Ayalon); (iii) Actualizing human rights of older persons with severe mental Illness (Anne Wand).Papers highlighting global strategies include: (i) "Our role and impact with the OEWGA/OHCHR /WHO" (Kiran Rabheru) illustrating how our advocacy has urged healthcare organizations and multilateral bodies such as the UNOEWGA, World Health Organization (WHO), and Office of UN High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) to prioritize the human rights agenda for older persons; (ii) Is a new treaty critical for policy making?A lawyer's perspective (Andrew Byrnes); (iii) "The Global Alliance for Rights Based Care and Support (GARBCS)'' (Carlos de Mendona Lima) underscoring the transformative potential of collaborative efforts in fostering a rights-based approach to care.Established to address challenges faced by older individuals worldwide, GARBCS promotes optimal mental health, combats ageism, and fosters collaboration among member organizations, aligning with UN Decade of Healthy Ageing and WHO's focus areas.Founding Members include AAGP, CHeBA, ILC-Canada, IPA, WDP, WFMH, WFP, WPA, and WONCA, organisations led by many of our IPA members.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".