Skipping of Exon 20 in <i>EP300</i> : A Novel Variant Linked to Rubinstein–Taybi Syndrome With Atypical and Severe Clinical Manifestations
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome (RSTS) is a rare autosomal dominant neurodevelopmental disorder linked to haploinsufficiency of CREBBP (RSTS1) and EP300 (RSTS2) genes. Characteristic features often include distinctive facial traits, broad thumbs and toes, short stature, and various degrees of intellectual disability. The clinical presentation of RSTS is notably variable, making it challenging to establish a clear genotype-phenotype correlation, except for specific variants which cause the allelic Menke-Hennekam syndrome. Trio exome analysis, data collection via networking and GeneMatcher platforms, transcript processing analysis, and DNA methylation profiling were performed. We identified two unrelated patients with de novo variants in EP300 (NM_001429.4: c.3671+5G>C; c.3671+5_3671+8delGTAA) predicted to cause in-frame exon 20 skipping, confirmed in one patient. In silico 3D protein modeling suggested that exon 20 deletion (comprising 27 amino acids) likely alters the structural conformation between the RING_CBP-p300 and HAT-KAT11 domains. Clinically, both patients displayed severe RSTS2-like clinical features, including autism spectrum disorder, speech delay, hearing loss, microcephaly, developmental delay, and intellectual disability, alongside ocular, respiratory, and cardiovascular abnormalities. Additionally, one patient developed early-onset colorectal cancer. DNA methylation profiling in Subject #1 confirmed RSTS but did not align with the specific episignatures for RSTS1 or RSTS2. We propose that skipping of exon 20 in EP300 is associated with a distinct form of Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome featuring clinical characteristics not fully aligning with RSTS1 or RSTS2. Our findings increase the understanding of RSTS genetic and molecular basis and stress the need for further research to establish definitive genotype-phenotype correlations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".