City-Level Integrated Traffic Management with User Preferences Under Connected Environment
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In transportation systems, road users have diverse preferences when planning their trips and responding to traffic conditions in a large city. Connected vehicles can capture the preferences of individual users for trip planning, leading to improved road performance. However, managing a large number of connected vehicles with differing user preferences in a large city is a daunting task. This paper develops an integrated traffic management system with the consideration of user preferences to optimize the performance of each user. In the system, connected vehicles are introduced to estimate traffic conditions and costs associated with different user preferences. The system will utilize the information to search for multi-layer vehicle control instructions that account for user preferences in mobility, energy consumption, and driving comfort. Microscopic simulations were carried out to assess the system’s efficacy in mitigating road congestion, reducing fuel consumption, and restricting turns. The results reveal that implementing the system can reduce vehicle delay by up to 32%, fuel consumption by 4%, and left and right turns by 24%. Additionally, the paper evaluates the impact of market shares of connected vehicles with different preferences to analyze their performance at different stages of connected vehicle development. The work can contribute to the development of advanced transportation services in future cities and enhance urban mobility and energy sustainability.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".