MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404763417 · doi:10.1139/tcsme-2024-0082

Internal cooling system effects to heat transfer and tool wear in turning operations of titanium alloys Ti6Al4V

2024· article· en· W4404763417 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Mohsen Soori, Fooad Karımı Ghaleh Jough

Bibliographic record

VenueTransactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical Engineering · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced machining processes and optimization
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTitanium alloyHeat transferMaterials scienceMechanical engineeringMetallurgyTitaniumMechanicsEngineeringAlloyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Internal cooling systems are essential for turning operations to improve the efficiency and quality of the machining process. In this paper, application of the virtual machining system is developed to analyze the effects of internal cooling systems on heat transfer and tool wear in turning operations of titanium alloys Ti6Al4V. The cutting forces as well as cutting temperature along machining paths are simulated in the virtual machining system to predict and analyze the effects of internal cooling system to the heat transfer and tool wear during turning operations. The coolant flow inside the internal cooling channels of a rotating cutting tool is simulated using computational fluid dynamics. Next, utilizing the modified Johnson–Cook model, the cutting temperature during turning operations is determined. The finite element method is employed to predict tool wear by applying the Takeyama–Murata analytical method. To validate the study, experimental works are implemented using turning machine tool. The cutting settings during experimental works are feed rate of 0.3 mm/rev, depth of cut of 2 mm, and cutting speed of 75 m/min. Thus, using the proposed virtual machining system, the performance of internal cooling system can be enhanced to increase cutting tool life and surface quality of machined parts in turning operations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.939
Threshold uncertainty score0.373

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.195
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTransactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical EngineeringSame topicAdvanced machining processes and optimizationFrench-language works237,207