“MEMORIA VAS MULTORUM CAPAX” MEMORIA AS A VESSEL OF JESUIT HISTORY,ACTION, AND IDENTITY
Bibliographic record
Abstract
During the 230 years before their suppression in 1773, the Jesuits developed a culture with memoria as a key foundation. In Jesuit schools memoria cultivated through exercises provided students access to concepts from which they constructed an understanding of ancient (and by the mid-eighteenth century more recent) history. In Jesuit culture, memoria provided access to “Jesuit time”, in which narratives of Jesuit martyrdoms were recalled backwards from the moment of martyrdom to earlier points in the martyr's life. Such recollections provided guideposts for spiritual life, helped create a remembered common history, and were enshrined in writings and rituals that sustained the collective identity of the widely dispersed Jesuits and shaped such innovations as Matteo Ricci’s “Memory Palace”. В течение 230 лет до роспуска ордена в 1773 г. иезуиты сформировали культуру, в основе которой была memoria. В иезуитских школах memoria культивировалась благодаря занятиям, предоставлявшим студентам доступ к идеям, из которых те выстраивали свою картину античной (а к середине XVIII в. и недавней) истории. В культуре иезуитов memoria предоставляла доступ ко «времени иезуитов», в котором нарративы мученичества иезуитов выстраивались в обратном порядке, от мученичества к более ранним событиям жизни мученика. Такие повествования создавали указания для духовной жизни и общую историю; они были запечатлены в сочинениях и ритуалах, питавших коллективную идентичность иезуитов, разбросанных по всему миру, и порождали такие новшества, как «Дворец памяти» Маттео Риччи.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".