MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404775105 · doi:10.21267/aquilo.2020.9.9.012

ОТКРЫТОЕ ПРОЯВЛЕНИЕ СКРЫТОГО ВАРВАРСТВА МАССОВЫЕ КАРАТЕЛЬНЫЕ АКЦИИ АЛЕКСАНДРА МАКЕДОНСКОГО ПЕРИОДА ПОКОРЕНИЯ «ДАЛЬНИХ» САТРАПИЙ

2020· article· ru· W4404775105 on OpenAlexfundno aff
КЛЕЙМЕНОВ А.А.

Bibliographic record

VenueЦивилизация и варварство · 2020
Typearticle
Languageru
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEurasian Exchange Networks
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersLatvijas UniversitateDanmarks GrundforskningsfondSvenska Forskningsrådet FormasNational Research FoundationUniversiteit LeidenUniversity of CambridgeUniversity of CincinnatiMcGill UniversityPrinceton UniversityUniversity of OxfordHarvard UniversityDumbarton Oaks Research Library and CollectionAmerican Philological Association
KeywordsPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Цель исследования заключается в анализе масштабных карательных экспедиций Александра Македонского периода покорения Восточного Ирана, Средней Азии и Северо-Западной Индии. Задачами являются рассмотрение характера карательных акций Александра, предпосылок их проведения и выявление наличия подобных элементов в военной практике предшествующего периода. Исследование опиралось на всесторонний анализ античных письменных источников, сравнительно-исторический метод, метод контент-анализа. Определяется, что карательные акции осуществлялись Александром посредством выделения из войска специальных отрядов и проводились в землях, населенных племенными сообществами. Схожие военные предприятия, связанные с грабежом, убийствами и порабощением населения были характерны для вооруженных конфликтов в «варварской» северной части Балканского полуострова, часто проходивших в форме набегов. Во времена Филиппа II карательные походы практиковались для подрыва военно-демографического потенциала варварских племенных объединений и государственных образований, а также являлись средством пополнения казны. Имея опыт осуществления экспедиций для пацификации балканских племен, армия Александра в более широких масштабах проводила их против непокорного населения «дальних» сатрапий, однако здесь экономически и логистически нецелесообразное обращение пленных в рабство уступило место массовым убийствам. The main aim of the article is to demonstrate the analysis of large-scale Alexander’s the Great punitive actions during the conquest of Easter Iran, Middle Asia and north-west India. The problems of the research are the consideration of the punitive action, its reasons and the discovering these elements in the previous time. A multi-faceted approach to the ancient narrative sources, methods of comparative historical analysis and content analysis have been used. It is determined that Alexander the Great detached the special part his army to make the punitive actions in tribal’ lands. The similar military actions were typical for «barbarian» from the north part of Balkan Peninsula. At Philip’s II time the punitive actions used for debauches of military and social potential of local tribes and for filling the treasury up. Having this experience Alexander used it with the bidder power against the intractable inhabitants of the eastern satrapies where to take people to slaves were inexpedient.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.762
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.007
Science and technology studies0.0040.003
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0070.002
Research integrity0.0030.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0210.022

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.071
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueЦивилизация и варварствоSame topicEurasian Exchange NetworksFrench-language works237,207