Bibliographic record
Abstract
В фокусе статьи — научный путь и идеи Карла Кереньи, филолога-классика, специалиста по греческой мифологии и религии. Обсуждается характер мировоззрения Кереньи, которое может быть охарактеризовано как филологический экзистенциализм. Это определение охватывает призыв Кереньи «проживать» религиозный опыт греков, его понимание гуманизма как экзистенциальной ответственности интеллектуала перед лицом тоталитарных идеологий и массовой культуры, его мнение, что современная культура обретет свою сущность через обращение к культуре и самосознанию греческой Античности, ее форме и стилю. Рассматриваются взгляды Кереньи на генезис эллинистического гуманизма, соотношение гуманизма и варварства, его суждения о том, что классическое образование и высокая культура достигаются только посредством «великих книг». Идеи Кереньи анализируются в контексте мнений поэтов, филологов и философов, рассуждавших об эллинизме, нераздельности гуманитарных наук и гуманизма, противоположности классической и массовой культуры. Среди этих авторов — Цицерон, Ф. Гёльдерлин, В.С. Соловьев, Ф.Ф. Зелинский, Вяч. Иванов, В. Отто, Т.С. Элиот, Э. Паунд, Т. Манн., Л. Штраус, М. Хайдеггер, Г.-Г. Гадамер и др. The article treats the scholarly career and ideas of Karl Kerényi, a classical philologist, a specialist in Greek mythology and religion. The nature of his worldview, which can be characterized as philological existentialism, is discussed. This definition comprehends Kerényi’s call to “live through” the religious experience of the Greeks, his understanding of humanism as the existential responsibility of an intellectual in the face of totalitarian ideologies and mass culture, his opinion that modern culture will acquire its essence through the reference to Greek antiquity, its form and style. Kerényi’s views on the genesis of Hellenistic humanism, the relationship between humanism and barbarism are considered, as also his thought that classical education and high culture can be acquired only through “great books”. Kerényi’s ideas are analyzed in the context of the opinions of poets, philologists and philosophers who talked about Hellenism, the inseparability of the humanities and humanism, the opposition of classical and mass culture. Among these authors are Cicero, F. Hölderlin, Vladimir Solovyov, Tadeusz Zieliński, Vyacheslav Ivanov, Walter Otto, T.S. Eliot, E. Pound, Thomas Mann., LeoStrauss, M. Heidegger, G.-G. Gadamer and others.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.016 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.014 | 0.009 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.030 | 0.016 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".