MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404775112 · doi:10.21267/aquilo.2020.9.9.023

ФИЛОЛОГИЧЕСКИЙ ЭКЗИСТЕНЦИАЛИЗМ КАРЛА КЕРЕНЬИ

2020· article· ru· W4404775112 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueЦивилизация и варварство · 2020
Typearticle
Languageru
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicClassical Studies and Philology
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersLatvijas UniversitateDanmarks GrundforskningsfondSvenska Forskningsrådet FormasNational Research FoundationUniversiteit LeidenUniversity of CambridgeUniversity of CincinnatiMcGill UniversityPrinceton UniversityUniversity of OxfordHarvard UniversityDumbarton Oaks Research Library and CollectionAmerican Philological Association
KeywordsPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

В фокусе статьи — научный путь и идеи Карла Кереньи, филолога-классика, специалиста по греческой мифологии и религии. Обсуждается характер мировоззрения Кереньи, которое может быть охарактеризовано как филологический экзистенциализм. Это определение охватывает призыв Кереньи «проживать» религиозный опыт греков, его понимание гуманизма как экзистенциальной ответственности интеллектуала перед лицом тоталитарных идеологий и массовой культуры, его мнение, что современная культура обретет свою сущность через обращение к культуре и самосознанию греческой Античности, ее форме и стилю. Рассматриваются взгляды Кереньи на генезис эллинистического гуманизма, соотношение гуманизма и варварства, его суждения о том, что классическое образование и высокая культура достигаются только посредством «великих книг». Идеи Кереньи анализируются в контексте мнений поэтов, филологов и философов, рассуждавших об эллинизме, нераздельности гуманитарных наук и гуманизма, противоположности классической и массовой культуры. Среди этих авторов — Цицерон, Ф. Гёльдерлин, В.С. Соловьев, Ф.Ф. Зелинский, Вяч. Иванов, В. Отто, Т.С. Элиот, Э. Паунд, Т. Манн., Л. Штраус, М. Хайдеггер, Г.-Г. Гадамер и др. The article treats the scholarly career and ideas of Karl Kerényi, a classical philologist, a specialist in Greek mythology and religion. The nature of his worldview, which can be characterized as philological existentialism, is discussed. This definition comprehends Kerényi’s call to “live through” the religious experience of the Greeks, his understanding of humanism as the existential responsibility of an intellectual in the face of totalitarian ideologies and mass culture, his opinion that modern culture will acquire its essence through the reference to Greek antiquity, its form and style. Kerényi’s views on the genesis of Hellenistic humanism, the relationship between humanism and barbarism are considered, as also his thought that classical education and high culture can be acquired only through “great books”. Kerényi’s ideas are analyzed in the context of the opinions of poets, philologists and philosophers who talked about Hellenism, the inseparability of the humanities and humanism, the opposition of classical and mass culture. Among these authors are Cicero, F. Hölderlin, Vladimir Solovyov, Tadeusz Zieliński, Vyacheslav Ivanov, Walter Otto, T.S. Eliot, E. Pound, Thomas Mann., LeoStrauss, M. Heidegger, G.-G. Gadamer and others.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.867
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0360.011

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.109
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.123 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it