MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4404781502 · doi:10.18653/v1/2024.wmt-1.4

Findings of the WMT 2024 Shared Task of the Open Language Data Initiative

2024· article· en· W4404781502 on OpenAlexaff
Jean Maillard, Laurie Burchell, Antonios Anastasopoulos, Christian Federmann, Philipp Koehn, Skyler Wang

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNatural Language Processing Techniques
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceTask (project management)Open dataNatural language processingArtificial intelligenceWorld Wide WebEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present the results of the WMT 2024 shared task of the Open Language Data Initiative.Participants were invited to contribute to the FLO-RES+ and MT Seed multilingual datasets, two foundational open resources that facilitate the organic expansion of language technology's reach.We accepted ten submissions covering 16 languages, which extended the range of languages included in the datasets and improved the quality of existing data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.192
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.407
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.192
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.1920.407
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.002
Bibliometrics0.0080.010
Science and technology studies0.0090.007
Scholarly communication0.0120.010
Open science0.0050.032
Research integrity0.0050.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.012

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.340
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicNatural Language Processing Techniques→French-language works237,207→